Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23519893›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of public health2014

Assessing population-wide behaviour change: concordance of 10-year trends in self-reported and observed sun protection.

Suzanne J Dobbinson, Kris Jamsen, Helen G Dixon, Matthew J Spittal, Magdalena Lagerlund, John E Lipscomb, Natalie L Herd, Melanie A Wakefield, David J Hill

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of public health, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Walking and Sun Protective Behaviors: Cross-Sectional Associations of Beneficial Health Factors.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Demographic differences in sun protection beliefs and behavior: a community-based study in Shanghai, China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Suzanne J DobbinsonCentre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Cancer Council Victoria, 1 Rathdowne Street, Carlton, Melbourne, VIC, 3053, Australia, Suzanne.Dobbinson@cancervic.org.au.
Kris Jamsen
Helen G Dixon
Matthew J Spittal
Magdalena Lagerlund
John E Lipscomb
Natalie L Herd
Melanie A Wakefield
David J Hill
Cancer Council Victoria · AUUniversity of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIncreases in socially desirable responses in self-reports might occur in the context of ongoing public education. We examine concordance of trends in two long-term studies monitoring population impact for SunSmart.

methodsOne study employed telephone interviews of Melbourne residents; the other entailed observations at public recreation venues across Melbourne. The studies assessed people's sun protection on identical weekend dates (Nw = 33 dates). Data from five summers between 1992 and 2001 (n ~ 23,000 individuals) were analysed. A body cover index score was calculated for participants on each date. Outcomes were aggregated separately for Saturdays and Sundays by date and year. Regression analyses tested whether these trends differed by survey method.

resultsThe pattern of change in body cover over time was similar for both surveys. Self-reported body cover was consistently higher than observed body cover, suggesting that social desirability bias may be present. Regression analyses showed no divergence between self-reported and observed trends in mean body cover, suggesting no evidence of significant increased social desirability bias in self-reporting over time.

conclusionFindings suggest that self-report offers a valid means of assessing change in a population's sun protection compliance over time, at least when self-reports are precisely focussed for time and activity context.

Indexed as

ClothingRisk Reduction BehaviorSelf ReportSunscreening AgentsAdolescentAdultConfidence IntervalsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLinear ModelsMaleMiddle AgedSunburnVictoriaYoung AdultSunscreening Agents

Identifiers

PMID23519893
OpenAlexW2014606446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.