ReviewSurgical endoscopy2013
The EURO-NOTES clinical registry for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: a 2-year activity report.
Review in Surgical endoscopy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Safety of transvaginal hybrid NOTES cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2015Pooled it
- Randomized clinical trial on the use of a colon-occlusion device to assist rectal washout.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Trial
- [Transvaginal cholecystectomy: results of a randomized study].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2014Trial
- Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: history and current development.Clinical endoscopy · 2026Review
- Advancements in endoscopic closure techniques for gastrointestinal luminal defects comparative perspectives on OTSC, endo suturing, TTS clips, and X-Tack.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Review
- The Feasibility and Safety of Robot-Assisted Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (RA-vNOTES) for Gynecologic Disease: 298-Case Series.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Review
- Article
- Advances in gastrointestinal surgical endoscopy.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2021Review
- Transvaginal hybrid-NOTES vs. traditional laparoscopic sigmoid resection for diverticulitis: a short-term comparative study.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Transanal hybrid colon resection: techniques and outcomes for benign colorectal diseases.Surgical endoscopy · 2020Article
- Transvaginal Hybrid NOTES Cholecystectomy: A Single-Centre Long-Term Experience on Sexual Function.World journal of surgery · 2018Article
- Direct target NOTES: prospective applications for next generation robotic platforms.Techniques in coloproctology · 2018Article
- Feasibility and Technique for Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery Liver Resection: A Porcine Model.Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques · 2017Article
- Risk of infection after iatrogenic perforation of the gut wall? Evaluation of preventive strategies in a randomized controlled animal trial.Surgical endoscopy · 2016Article
- Pure Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) with a new elongated, curved Transanal Endoscopic Operation (TEO) device for rectosigmoid resection: a survival study in a porcine model.Techniques in coloproctology · 2016Article
- Shifting Paradigms in Minimally Invasive Surgery: Applications of Transanal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery in Colorectal Surgery.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2015Review
- Emerging Techniques in Minimally Invasive Surgery. Pros and Cons.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2015Review
- Transvaginal cholecystectomy learning curve.Surgical endoscopy · 2015Article
- [Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery in Germany: Data from the German NOTES registry].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe EURO-NOTES Clinical Registry (ECR) was established as a European database to allow the monitoring and safe introduction of Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES). The aim of this study was to analyze different techniques applied and relative results during the first 2 years of the ECR.
methodsThe ECR was designed as a voluntary database with online access. All members of the European Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery were requested to participate in the registry. Demographic and therapy data as well as data on the postoperative course are recorded in the ECR in an anonymous way.
resultsA total of 533 patients who underwent NOTES procedures were included in the study. Four different hybrid techniques for 435 cholecystectomies were described, registering postoperative complications in 2.8% of patients, addition of a single trocar in 5.3%, and conversions to laparoscopy in 0.5%. Both flexible endoscopic and rigid laparoscopic cholecystectomy techniques proved to be safe and effective with minor differences. There was a shorter operative time in the rigid laparoscopic group. Thirty-three appendectomies were reported by transgastric and transvaginal techniques, with transvaginal techniques scoring shorter operative time and hospital stay, but with a frequent need to add more trocars. Overall complications occurred in 14.7% of patients but they did not differ significantly among the different techniques. One transvaginal and 31 transanal sigmoidectomies were included for prolapse and diverticulitis, with four postoperative complications (12.5%), but none needing further treatment. Twenty peroral esophageal myotomies were included with three postoperative complications (15.0%), but none needing further treatment.
conclusionsFive years since the introduction of NOTES into clinical practice, hybrid techniques have gained considerable clinical application. Several NOTES hybrid cholecystectomy and appendectomy techniques are practicable and safe alternatives to laparoscopic procedures. Also, sigmoidectomies and peroral esophageal myotomies were described, proving feasibility and safety. Nevertheless, the real benefit of NOTES for patients still needs to be assessed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23519494What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.