Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23519489›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2013

Transanal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) rectal resection: "down-to-up" total mesorectal excision (TME)--short-term outcomes in the first 20 cases.

Antonio M de Lacy, David W Rattner, Cedric Adelsdorfer, Marta M Tasende, María Fernández, Salvadora Delgado, Patricia Sylla, Graciela Martínez-Palli

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 123 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
123citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
20.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03422835 phase2unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

A Prospective Cohort Study of Robotic Transanal Total Mesentery Excision Versus Conventional Robotic Surgery for Rectal Cancer in Low Site

TypeinterventionalSponsorDaping Hospital and the Research Institute of Surgery of the Third Military Medical UniversityRan2018 to 2023Enrolled50ConditionsRectal NeoplasmsArmsR-TME, R-TaTME
NCT04949672 completednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Pathology Assessment of Mesorectal Fascia and Specimen Quality After TME by Laparoscopic, Open, TransAnal and Robotic Approaches (LOTARTME)

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorSan Giovanni Addolorata HospitalRan2017 to 2021Enrolled153ConditionsRectal Cancer, Surgery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

123 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 299 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Surgeons' assessment of internal anal sphincter nerve supply during TaTME - inbetween expectations and reality.Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy · 2016
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

63 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Antonio M de LacyDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Institute of Digestive and Metabolic Diseases (ICMDM), Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas, Centro Esther Koplowitz, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. alacy@clinic.ub.es
David W Rattner
Cedric Adelsdorfer
Marta M Tasende
María Fernández
Salvadora Delgado
Patricia Sylla
Graciela Martínez-Palli
Universitat de Barcelona · ESCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas · ESHarvard University · USHospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESMassachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe transanal minilaparoscopy-assisted natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) approach holds significant promise as a safe and less morbid alternative to conventional low anterior rectal resection. Previous reports have shown satisfactory short-term oncologic results. We evaluated the safety and short-term outcomes in rectal cancer subjects who underwent transanal minilaparoscopy-assisted natural orifice surgery total mesorectal excision (TME) rectal resection.

methodsTwenty selected patients with rectal cancer were enrolled onto a prospective study of minilaparoscopy-assisted natural orifice surgery TME rectal resection. The study endpoints were safety of access (intra- or postoperative morbidity) and adequacy of oncological resection criteria; intact TME; distal and circumferential margins; and number of lymph nodes retrieved.

resultsAll procedures were successfully completed with the transanal NOTES and minilaparoscopy technique. The mean age was 65 ± 10 years; 55% of patients were male; the mean body mass index was 25.3 ± 3.8 kg/m(2). Thirty-five percent of tumors were in the distal rectum, 50% in midrectum, and 15% in proximal rectum. Coloanal anastomoses were hand sewn in 65% and stapled in 35%. Mean operative time was 235 ± 56 min. There were no procedure-related complications. Pathologic analysis demonstrated negative distal and circumferential margins in all patients. An average of 15.9 ± 4.3 lymph nodes were retrieved. The mesorectal fascia was intact in all the specimens.

conclusionsThis study demonstrates that transanal NOTES with minilaparoscopic assistance in the hands of a specialized team is safe; meets the oncologic requirements for high-quality rectal cancer surgery; and may offer advantages over pure laparoscopic approaches for visualizing and dissecting out the distal mesorectum. Minilaparoscopic assistance allows one to compensate for the limitations of current NOTES instrumentation to ensure the safety and adequacy of oncologic resection in these difficult cases. Careful patient selection, a specialized team, and long-term outcome evaluation are critical before this procedure can be considered for routine clinical use.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedDigestive System Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNatural Orifice Endoscopic SurgeryPatient SelectionProspective StudiesRectal NeoplasmsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID23519489
OpenAlexW1988180872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.