Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23519442›Full record

ArticleJournal of computational neuroscience2013

Emergent dynamics in a model of visual cortex.

Aaditya V Rangan, Lai-Sang Young

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computational neuroscience, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Rhythm and Synchrony in a Cortical Network Model.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  10. Orientation Selectivity from Very Sparse LGN Inputs in a Comprehensive Model of Macaque V1 Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Emergent spike patterns in neuronal populations.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2015
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Aaditya V RanganCourant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York University, New York, NY, USA, rangan@cims.nyu.edu.
Lai-Sang Young

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper proposes that the network dynamics of the mammalian visual cortex are highly structured and strongly shaped by temporally localized barrages of excitatory and inhibitory firing we call 'multiple-firing events' (MFEs). Our proposal is based on careful study of a network of spiking neurons built to reflect the coarse physiology of a small patch of layer 2/3 of V1. When appropriately benchmarked this network is capable of reproducing the qualitative features of a range of phenomena observed in the real visual cortex, including spontaneous background patterns, orientation-specific responses, surround suppression and gamma-band oscillations. Detailed investigation into the relevant regimes reveals causal relationships among dynamical events driven by a strong competition between the excitatory and inhibitory populations. It suggests that along with firing rates, MFE characteristics can be a powerful signature of a regime. Testable predictions based on model observations and dynamical analysis are proposed.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAction PotentialsAnimalsBenchmarkingContrast SensitivityElectrophysiological PhenomenaExcitatory Postsynaptic PotentialsForecastingNerve NetNeuronsOrientationReceptors, AMPAReceptors, GABA-AReproducibility of ResultsVisual CortexReceptors, AMPAReceptors, GABA-A

Identifiers

PMID23519442
PMCPMC3766520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.