Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23519390›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO2013

Direct recordings from the auditory cortex in a cochlear implant user.

Kirill V Nourski, Christine P Etler, John F Brugge, Hiroyuki Oya, Hiroto Kawasaki, Richard A Reale, Paul J Abbas, Carolyn J Brown, Matthew A Howard

Open access · bronzeAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Auditory cortical plasticity in cochlear implant users.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Selective Neuronal Activation by Cochlear Implant Stimulation in Auditory Cortex of Awake Primate.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kirill V NourskiDepartment of Neurosurgery, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA. kirill-nourski@uiowa.edu
Christine P Etler
John F Brugge
Hiroyuki Oya
Hiroto Kawasaki
Richard A Reale
Paul J Abbas
Carolyn J Brown
Matthew A Howard
University of Iowa · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Speech Production &LanguageP50DC000242 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Bob McMurray · 1989 to 2026
$58.8M
UNIVERSITY OF IOWA CTSA FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR024979 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI ROSENTHAL, GARY E · 2007 to 2011
$31.8M
HUMAN AUDITORY CORTEX PHYSIOLOGYR01DC004290 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI HOWARD, MATTHEW A. · 2000 to 2025
$13.7M
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024979NCRR NIH HHS UL1RR024979NIDCD NIH HHS P50 DC000242NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC004290NIDCD NIH HHS R01-DC04290
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve with a cochlear implant (CI) is the method of choice for treatment of severe-to-profound hearing loss. Understanding how the human auditory cortex responds to CI stimulation is important for advances in stimulation paradigms and rehabilitation strategies. In this study, auditory cortical responses to CI stimulation were recorded intracranially in a neurosurgical patient to examine directly the functional organization of the auditory cortex and compare the findings with those obtained in normal-hearing subjects. The subject was a bilateral CI user with a 20-year history of deafness and refractory epilepsy. As part of the epilepsy treatment, a subdural grid electrode was implanted over the left temporal lobe. Pure tones, click trains, sinusoidal amplitude-modulated noise, and speech were presented via the auxiliary input of the right CI speech processor. Additional experiments were conducted with bilateral CI stimulation. Auditory event-related changes in cortical activity, characterized by the averaged evoked potential and event-related band power, were localized to posterolateral superior temporal gyrus. Responses were stable across recording sessions and were abolished under general anesthesia. Response latency decreased and magnitude increased with increasing stimulus level. More apical intracochlear stimulation yielded the largest responses. Cortical evoked potentials were phase-locked to the temporal modulations of periodic stimuli and speech utterances. Bilateral electrical stimulation resulted in minimal artifact contamination. This study demonstrates the feasibility of intracranial electrophysiological recordings of responses to CI stimulation in a human subject, shows that cortical response properties may be similar to those obtained in normal-hearing individuals, and provides a basis for future comparisons with extracranial recordings.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantsAuditory CortexElectric StimulationFemaleHearing Loss, SensorineuralHumansMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID23519390
PMCPMC3642273
OpenAlexW2100589624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.