ArticleJournal of lower genital tract disease2013
Five-year risk of recurrence after treatment of CIN 2, CIN 3, or AIS: performance of HPV and Pap cotesting in posttreatment management.
Article in Journal of lower genital tract disease, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 89 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence and potential implications of HPV infection in transgender women with gender reaffirming genital surgery: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.Sexually transmitted infections · 2025Pooled it
- 2023 Canadian Colposcopy Guideline: A Risk-Based Approach to Management and Surveillance of Cervical Dysplasia.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Guideline
- Diagnosis and Management of Adenocarcinoma in Situ: A Society of Gynecologic Oncology Evidence-Based Review and Recommendations.Obstetrics and gynecology · 2020Guideline
- Human Papillomavirus Genotyping Compared With a Qualitative High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Test After Treatment of High-Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia: A Systematic Review.Obstetrics and gynecology · 2019Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Randomized clinical trial protocol: Acceptability and feasibility of combination treatment for cervical precancer among South African women living with HIV (ACT 2).Contemporary clinical trials · 2026Trial
- Efficacy of Combination Treatment for Cervical Precancer Among Women Living with HIV in South Africa: Secondary Outcomes from the ACT 2 Randomized Controlled Trial.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Acceptability and Feasibility of Combination Treatment for Cervical Precancer Among Women Living with HIV in South Africa: Primary Outcomes from the ACT 2 Randomized Trial.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Towards Cervical Cancer Elimination: Insights from an In-Depth Regional Review of Patients with Cervical Cancer.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- The treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 (HSIL): between active surveillance and surgery-a 10-year monocentric data analysis.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2025Article
- Proposal of a Risk Stratification Model for Recurrence After Excisional Treatment of High-Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (HG-CIN).Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Gynecologic Cancer Screening and Prevention: State of the Science and Practice.Current treatment options in oncology · 2025Review
- Impact of postsurgical vaginal microbiome on high-risk HPV infection and recurrence risk in patients with cervical cancer and intraepithelial neoplasia: A retrospective study.Gynecologic oncology reports · 2024Article
- Emerging trends and hotspots in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia research from 2013 to 2023: A bibliometric analysis.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Calendar-period trends in cervical precancer and cancer diagnoses since the introduction of human papillomavirus and cytology co-testing into routine cervical cancer screening at Kaiser Permanente Northern California.Gynecologic oncology · 2024Article
- Comprehensive overview of genotype distribution and prevalence of human papillomavirus in cervical lesions.Gynecology and obstetrics clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Prognostic Prediction for Recurrent/Residual CIN in HSIL Patients After Conization: An Updated Retrospective Study Based on Ambulatory Surgery.Journal of inflammation research · 2024Article
- Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of HPV Extended versus Partial Genotyping for Cervical Cancer Screening in Singapore.Cancers · 2023Article
- Hysterectomy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: A retrospective observational multi-institutional study.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2022Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveAfter excisional treatment, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN 2+) can recur. It is not clear how many negative posttreatment Pap or cotest results are needed to ensure adequate safety against CIN 2+ before returning to extended retesting intervals.
methodsWe observed 5-year risks of CIN 2+ for 3 follow-up management strategies after treatment (Pap-alone, human papillomavirus [HPV]-alone, and HPV/Pap cotesting) for 3,273 women aged 25 years and older who were treated for CIN 2, CIN 3, or adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) between 2003 and 2010 at Kaiser Permanente Northern California.
resultsFive-year risks of recurrent CIN 2+ after treatment varied both by antecedent screening test result and the histology of the treated lesion. The risk ranged from 5% for CIN 2 preceded by HPV-positive/atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion to 16% for CIN 3/AIS preceded by atypical glandular cells (AGC)/atypical squamous cells cannot rule out high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (ASC-H)/high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or worse (HSIL+) (p < .0001). However, after posttreatment negative tests, risks were lowered and similar regardless of antecedent screening test and histology of treated disease. The 5-year recurrent CIN 2+ risk after a negative posttreatment cotest (2.4%) was lower than that following a negative HPV test (3.7%, p = .3) or negative Pap result (4.2%, p = .1). Two negative posttreatment tests of each kind conferred slightly lower 5-year CIN 2+ risk than one (2 negative Pap tests vs. 1, 2.7% vs 4.2%, p = .2; 2 negative HPV tests vs. 1, 2.7% vs 3.7%, p = .7; 2 negative cotests vs. 1, 1.5% vs 2.4%, p = .8). The 5-year CIN 2+ risk after 2 negative cotests of 1.5% (95% confidence interval = 0.3%-7.2%) approached the 0.68% risk after a negative Pap test during routine screening.
conclusionsWomen with antecedent AGC/ASC-H/HSIL+ Pap results or those treated for CIN 3/AIS had a substantial risk of developing CIN 2+ posttreatment. On the basis of the principle of "equal management of equal risks," after negative test results posttreatment, no subgroup of women achieved risk sufficiently low to return to 5-year routine screening. However, negative cotests after treatment provided more reassurance against recurrent CIN 2+ than either negative Pap tests or HPV tests alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.