Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23518704›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of surgery2013

Randomized controlled trial to reduce bacterial colonization of surgical drains after breast and axillary operations.

Amy C Degnim, Jeffrey S Scow, Tanya L Hoskin, Joyce P Miller, Margie Loprinzi, Judy C Boughey, James W Jakub, Alyssa Throckmorton, Robin Patel, Larry M Baddour

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of surgery, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01286168 phase2completednot on this map

Trial of Drain Antisepsis After Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction

TypeinterventionalSponsorMayo ClinicRan2011 to 2013Enrolled110ConditionsNonmalignant Breast Conditions, Breast CancerArmsSodium hypochlorite (Dakin's Solution), Chlorhexidine gluconate disk, Control, Occlusive Adhesive Dressing
NCT03229824 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Randomized Controlled Trial to Reduce Surgical Site Infections in Breast Cancer Surgery With Clorhexidine Gluconate Securement Dressing (Tegaderm CHG)

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Institute of CancerologíaRan2016 to 2018Enrolled116ConditionsBreast CancerArmsAntiseptic occlusive dressing group
NCT04577846 phase3unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Surgical Site Infection (SSI) Rates in Patients Undergoing Mastectomy Without Reconstruction, a Comparison Among Those Receiving Preoperative Prophylactic Antibiotics Alone Versus Continued Prophylactic Antibiotics Postoperatively-A Multicenter, Double-blinded Randomized Control Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorAga Khan UniversityRan2020 to 2022Enrolled384ConditionsSurgical Site InfectionArmsCephalexin 500 MG, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amy C DegnimDepartment of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA. degnim.amy@mayo.edu
Jeffrey S Scow
Tanya L Hoskin
Joyce P Miller
Margie Loprinzi
Judy C Boughey
James W Jakub
Alyssa Throckmorton
Robin Patel
Larry M Baddour
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · US

Funding

MAYO CLINIC CENTER FOR TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE ACTIVITIESUL1RR024150 · NCRR · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI RIZZA, ROBERT A. · 2006 to 2011
$66.4M
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024150
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine whether bacterial colonization of drains can be reduced by local antiseptic interventions.

backgroundDrains are a potential source of bacterial entry into surgical wounds and may contribute to surgical site infection after breast surgery.

methodsAfter institutional review board approval, patients undergoing total mastectomy and/or axillary lymph node dissection were randomized to standard drain care (control) or drain antisepsis (treated). Standard drain care comprised twice daily cleansing with alcohol swabs. Antisepsis drain care included (1) a chlorhexidine disc at the drain exit site and (2) irrigation of the drain bulb twice daily with dilute sodium hypochlorite (Dakin's) solution. Culture results of drain fluid and tubing were compared between control and antisepsis groups.

resultsOverall, 100 patients with 125 drains completed the study with 48 patients (58 drains) in the control group and 52 patients (67 drains) in the antisepsis group. Cultures of drain bulb fluid at 1 week were positive (1+ or greater growth) in 66% (38/58) of control drains compared with 21% (14/67) of antisepsis drains (P = 0.0001). Drain tubing cultures demonstrated more than 50 colony-forming units in 19% (8/43) of control drains versus 0% (0/53) of treated drains (P = 0.004). Surgical site infection was diagnosed in 6 patients (6%)--5 patients in the control group and 1 patient in the antisepsis group (P = 0.06).

conclusionsSimple and inexpensive local antiseptic interventions with a chlorhexidine disc and hypochlorite solution reduce bacterial colonization of drains. Based on these data, further study of drain antisepsis and its potential impact on surgical site infection rate is warranted (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01286168).

Indexed as

Lymph Node ExcisionMastectomyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAxillaBacterial LoadCathetersChlorhexidineDisinfectantsDrainageFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLinear ModelsLogistic ModelsChlorhexidineDisinfectantsSodium Hypochlorite

Identifiers

PMID23518704
PMCPMC3954532
OpenAlexW2068307122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.