Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23518270›Full record

SynthesisNeuroscience and biobehavioral reviews2013

A systematic review of fMRI reward paradigms used in studies of adolescents vs. adults: the impact of task design and implications for understanding neurodevelopment.

Jessica M Richards, Rista C Plate, Monique Ernst

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 113 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
113citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

113 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Social feedback biases emerge during recall but not prediction and shift across the development of social anxiety.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

53 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jessica M RichardsDepartment of Psychology, University of Maryland College Park, 2103R Cole Field House, College Park, MD 20741, USA. jessic1@umd.edu
Rista C Plate
Monique Ernst

Funding

fMRI Studies Of Pediatric Mood And Anxiety DisordersZIAMH002781 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI PINE, DANIEL · 2009 to 2025
$41.5M
Behavioral Technologies for Predicting HIV RiskR01DA018647 · NIDA · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI LEJUEZ, CARL W · 2005 to 2014
$5.2M
Drug Choice, Impulsivity, and Risky Sexual BehaviorR01DA019405 · NIDA · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI LEJUEZ, CARL W · 2006 to 2009
$1.3M
Integration of Basic Neuroscience Research into Addiction Treatment DevelopmentT32DA028855 · NIDA · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI LEJUEZ, CARL W · 2010 to 2014
$855k
Novel Intervention for Drug Use and HIV Risk among Anxiety Sensitive Heroin UsersR01DA023384 · NIDA · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI LEJUEZ, CARL W · 2009 to 2010
$744k
Behavioral Measurement of Negative Reinforcement in Adolescent Alcohol Use/AbuseR21AA017685 · NIAAA · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI LEJUEZ, CARL W · 2009 to 2010
$423k
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA MH002781NIAAA NIH HHS R21 AA017685NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA018647NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA019405NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA023384NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA028855
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The neural systems underlying reward-related behaviors across development have recently generated a great amount of interest. Yet, the neurodevelopmental literature on reward processing is marked by inconsistencies due to the heterogeneity of the reward paradigms used, the complexity of the behaviors being studied, and the developing brain itself as a moving target. The present review will examine task design as one source of variability across findings by compiling this literature along three dimensions: (1) task structures, (2) cognitive processes, and (3) neural systems. We start with the presentation of a heuristic neural systems model, the Triadic Model, as a way to provide a theoretical framework for the neuroscience research on motivated behaviors. We then discuss the principles guiding reward task development. Finally, we review the extant developmental neuroimaging literature on reward-related processing, organized by reward task type. We hope that this approach will help to clarify the literature on the functional neurodevelopment of reward-related neural systems, and to identify the role of the experimental parameters that significantly influence these findings.

Indexed as

RewardAdolescentAdultAgingBrainCognitionDecision MakingHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingOxygenOxygen

Identifiers

PMID23518270
PMCPMC3809756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.