Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23517522›Full record

ArticleJournal of biological engineering2013

Effect of substrate stiffness on early human embryonic stem cell differentiation.

Nikolai Eroshenko, Rukmani Ramachandran, Vamsi K Yadavalli, Raj R Rao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biological engineering, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Mechanically guided cell fate determination in early development.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Intrinsic Mechanical Cues and Their Impact on Stem Cells and Embryogenesis.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  14. A State-of-the-Art of Functional Scaffolds for 3D Nervous Tissue Regeneration.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Topographic Cues Impact on Embryonic Stem Cell Zscan4-Metastate.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nikolai Eroshenko *Department of Chemical and Life Science Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Rukmani Ramachandran *Department of Chemical and Life Science Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Vamsi K YadavalliDepartment of Chemical and Life Science Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Raj R RaoDepartment of Chemical and Life Science Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe pluripotency and self renewing properties of human embryonic stem cells (hESC) make them a valuable tool in the fields of developmental biology, pharmacology and regenerative medicine. Therefore, there exists immense interest in devising strategies for hESC propagation and differentiation. Methods involving simulation of the native stem cell microenvironment, both chemical and physical, have received a lot of attention in recent years. Equally important is evidence that cells can also sense the mechanical properties of their microenvironment. In this study, we test the hypothesis that hESCs accept mechanical cues for differentiation from the substrate by culturing them on flexible polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) of varying stiffness.

resultsPDMS substrates were prepared using available commercial formulations and characterized for stiffness, surface properties and efficiency of cell attachment and proliferation. Across different substrate stiffness, cell numbers, cell attachment and cell surface area were found to be similar. Expression of pluripotency markers decreased with increased time in culture across all PDMS substrates of varying stiffness. Analysis of gene expression of differentiation markers indicates that the differentiation process becomes less stochastic with longer culture times.

conclusionsWe evaluated the utility of PDMS substrates for stem cell propagation and substrate mediated differentiation. The stiffness affected gene expression of pluripotent and differentiation markers with results indicating that these substrate systems could potentially be used to direct hESC fate towards early mesodermal lineages. This study suggests that coupled with soluble factors, PDMS substrates could potentially be useful in generating defined populations of differentiated cells.

Identifiers

PMID23517522
PMCPMC3621683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.