Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23517330›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of dermatology2013

Immunohistochemical and ultrastructural features of congenital melanocytic naevus cells support a stem-cell phenotype.

V A Kinsler, G Anderson, B Latimer, D Natarajan, E Healy, G E Moore, N J Sebire

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of dermatology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Clonogenic cell subpopulations maintain congenital melanocytic nevi.The Journal of investigative dermatology · 2015
    Article
  8. Melanocyte stem cells as potential therapeutics in skin disorders.Expert opinion on biological therapy · 2014
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

V A KinslerPaediatric Dermatology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, WC1N 3JH, UK. v.kinsler@ucl.ac.uk
G Anderson
B Latimer
D Natarajan
E Healy
G E Moore
N J Sebire
Great Ormond Street Hospital · GBInstitute of Child Health · INUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMultiple congenital melanocytic naevi (CMN) in one individual are caused by somatic mosaicism for NRAS mutations; however, the lineage of the mutated cells remains uncertain.

objectivesTo test the hypothesis that CMN may be derived from cutaneous stem cells.

methodsSixty-six CMN samples from 44 patients were stained for immunohistochemical (IHC) markers of melanocytic differentiation (TYR, TRP1, TRP2, LEF1, MITF, cKit), pluripotency (nestin, fascin, CD133, CD20, CD34), monocyte/macrophage lineage (CD68, CD163, CD14), proliferation (Ki67) and MTOR/Wnt-signalling pathway activation (pS6, β-catenin). Semiquantitative scoring compared samples with naevus cell nesting (group 1) with those with only diffuse dermal infiltration (group 2). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was performed on 10 samples.

resultsA normal melanocyte population was seen overlying many dermal CMN. Group 1 samples were significantly more likely to express melanocytic differentiation markers than group 2, and expression decreased significantly with depth. Expression of these markers was correlated with each other, and with nestin and fascin. CD20 staining was positive in a substantial proportion and was stronger superficially. Expression of β-catenin and pS6 was almost universal. Some samples expressed monocyte/macrophage markers. TEM revealed variable naevus cell morphology, striking macromelanosomes, double cilia and microvilli.

conclusionsCongenital melanocytic naevi development frequently coexists with normal overlying melanocyte development, leading us to hypothesize that in these cases CMN are likely to develop from a cell present in the skin independent of, or remaining after, normal melanocytic migration. IHC and TEM findings are compatible with CMN cells being of cutaneous stem-cell origin, capable of some degree of melanocytic differentiation superficially.

Indexed as

Antigens, DifferentiationAntigens, NeoplasmBiomarkers, TumorCell LineageHumansImmunohistochemistryMicroscopy, Electron, TransmissionNeoplastic Stem CellsNevus, PigmentedPhenotypeSkinSkin NeoplasmsUltrasonographyAntigens, DifferentiationAntigens, NeoplasmBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID23517330
PMCPMC3838625
OpenAlexW2094869532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.