ArticleAcademic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine2013
Providers' perceptions of the factors influencing the implementation of the New York State mandatory HIV testing law in two Urban academic emergency departments.
Article in Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Validating the information technology (IT) implementation framework to Implement mHealth technology for consumers: A case study of the Sense2Quit app for smoking cessation.International journal of medical informatics · 2025Article
- Innovation and implementation determinants of HIV testing and linkage-to-care in the U.S.: a systematic review.Implementation science communications · 2024Review
- Article
- Effect of Participative Web-Based Educational Modules on HIV and Sexually Transmitted Infection Prevention Competency Among Medical Students: Single-Arm Interventional Study.JMIR medical education · 2023Article
- Attitudes, practices and perceived barriers to hepatitis C screening among medical residents at a large urban academic medical center.Journal of viral hepatitis · 2019Article
- Article
- Missed Opportunities for HIV Testing of Patients Tested for Sexually Transmitted Infections at a Large Urban Health Care System From 2010 to 2015.Open forum infectious diseases · 2018Article
- Care continuum entry interventions: seek and test strategies to engage persons most impacted by HIV within the United States.AIDS (London, England) · 2018Review
- Lessons Learned From the Development and Parameterization of a Computer Simulation Model to Evaluate Task Modification for Health Care Providers.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2018Article
- Article
- Patient and doctor perspectives on HIV screening in the emergency department: A prospective cross-sectional study.PloS one · 2017Article
- Impact of Mandatory HIV Screening in the Emergency Department: A Queuing Study.Research in nursing & health · 2016Article
- Increasing HIV testing among African immigrants in ireland: challenges and opportunities.Journal of immigrant and minority health · 2015Article
- HIV testing implementation in two urban cities: practice, policy, and perceived barriers.PloS one · 2014Article
- Timing Matters: HIV Testing Rates in the Emergency Department.Nursing research and practice · 2014Article
- An electronic alert for HIV screening in the emergency department increases screening but not the diagnosis of HIV.Applied clinical informatics · 2014Article
- Understanding HIV screening in the emergency department: is perception reality?Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2013Article
- Sociotechnical Analysis of Health Information Exchange Consent Processes in an HIV Clinic.The Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care : JANACObservational
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesOf the 1.1 million people in the United States infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), more than 20% are unaware of their infection. To increase early diagnosis and treatment, New York State recently passed legislation mandating that HIV testing be offered to all patients, ages 13 to 64 years, receiving health care services. Implementation of this legislation is complex, especially in the emergency department (ED). This study explores ED providers' perceptions of the factors affecting the implementation of the law.
methodsThe authors conducted six focus group sessions and three in-depth interviews with ED health care providers from two New York City teaching hospitals. Sessions were audiotaped and transcribed. Data were coded and summarized thematically through an iterative process after each session.
resultsA total of 49 providers participated and data saturation was achieved. Six factors were identified that predispose a provider to offer an HIV test: 1) self-efficacy, 2) behavioral intention, 3) the testing process, 4) provider knowledge of the legislation, 5) type of HIV test, and 6) follow-up procedures. Five factors were identified that enable providers to offer an HIV test: 1) resources related to time, 2) space, 3) staff, 4) type of test, and 5) timing of the offer. Improving access to HIV testing, linkage to care, and public health were all key factors in reinforcing providers' desire to offer HIV tests. Concerns regarding overall cost saving and coverage for the test were indicated as barriers that needed to be resolved to reinforce the providers to offer an HIV test.
conclusionsUnderstanding the factors influencing the practice of ED providers charged with carrying out this mandate is critical. Despite earlier research that indicated that offering HIV testing to ED patients is largely influenced by cost, this study found additional factors that are important to consider to effectively implementing HIV testing in the ED.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.