Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23517254›Full record

ArticleAcademic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine2013

Reduction in observation unit length of stay with coronary computed tomography angiography depends on time of emergency department presentation.

Simon A Mahler, Brian C Hiestand, Jamaji Nwanaji-Enwerem, David C Goff, Gregory L Burke, L Douglas Case, Bret Nicks, Chadwick D Miller

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Simon A MahlerDepartment of Epidemiology and Prevention, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA. smahler@wfubmc.edu
Brian C Hiestand
Jamaji Nwanaji-Enwerem
David C Goff
Gregory L Burke
L Douglas Case
Bret Nicks
Chadwick D Miller
Wake Forest University · USMorehouse College · US

Funding

Training Grant in Quality of Care and Outcomes Research in Cardiovascular DiseaseT32HL087730 · NHLBI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI GOFF, DAVID C · 2008 to 2011
$1.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL087730NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL 87730
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPrior studies demonstrating shorter length of stay (LOS) from coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) relative to stress testing in emergency department (ED) patients have not considered time of patient presentation. The objectives of this study were to determine whether low-risk chest pain patients receiving stress testing or CCTA have differences in ED plus observation unit (OU) LOS and if there are disparities in testing modality use, based on the time of patient presentation to the ED.

methodsThe authors examined a cohort of low-risk chest pain patients evaluated in an ED-based OU using prospective and retrospective OU registry data. During the study period, stress testing and CCTA were both available from 08:00 to 17:00 hours. CCTA was not available on weekends, and therefore only subjects presenting on weekdays were included. Cox regression analysis was used to model the effect of testing modality (stress testing vs. CCTA) on OU LOS. Separate models were fit based on time of patient presentation to the ED using 4-hour blocks beginning at midnight. The primary independent variable was testing modality: stress testing or CCTA. Age, sex, and race were included as covariates. Logistic regression was used to model testing modality choice by time period adjusted for age, sex, and race.

resultsOver the study period, 841 subjects presented Monday through Friday. Median LOS was 18.0 hours (interquartile range [IQR] = 11.7 to 22.9 hours). Objective cardiac testing was completed in 788 of 841 (94%) patients, with 496 (63%) receiving stress testing and 292 (37%) receiving CCTA. After age, race, and sex were adjusted for, patients presenting between 08:00 and 11:59 hours not only had a shorter LOS associated with CCTA (p < 0.0001), but also had a greater likelihood of being tested by CCTA (p = 0.001). None of the other time periods had significant differences in LOS or testing modality choice for CCTA relative to stress testing.

conclusionsIn an OU setting with weekday and standard business hours CCTA availability, CCTA testing was associated with shorter LOS among low-risk chest pain patients only in patients presenting to the ED between 08:00 and 11:59 hours. That time period was also associated with a greater likelihood of being tested by CCTA, suggesting that ED providers may have intuited the inability of CCTA to shorten LOS during other times.

Indexed as

AdultChest PainCohort StudiesCoronary AngiographyCoronary VesselsEmergency Medical ServicesEmergency TreatmentExercise TestFemaleHumansLength of StayLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedNorth CarolinaPatient Discharge

Identifiers

PMID23517254
PMCPMC3607957
OpenAlexW1990198174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.