Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23517178›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of pharmacology2013

Potential enhancing effects of histamine H₁ agonism/H₃ antagonism on working memory assessed by performance and bold response in healthy volunteers.

P van Ruitenbeek, M A Mehta

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of pharmacology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Histamine: A Key Neuromodulator of Memory Consolidation and Retrieval.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Histamine HEJNMMI research · 2018
    Article
  11. Histamine pharmacology: four years on.British journal of pharmacology · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

P van RuitenbeekCentre for Neuroimaging Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, UK. peter.vanruitenbeek@faber.kuleuven.be
M A Mehta
King's College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeSchizophrenia is a highly debilitating disorder characterized by hallucinations and delusions, but also impaired cognition such as memory. While hallucinations and delusions are the main target for pharmacological treatment, cognitive impairments are rarely treated. Evidence exists that histamine has a role in the cognitive deficits in schizophrenia, which could be the basis of the development of a histamine-type treatment. Histamine H₃ antagonists have been shown to improve memory performance in experimental animals, but these effects have been little investigated in humans within the context of impaired cognition in schizophrenia and using sensitive measures of brain activity. In the present study, the effects of betahistine (H₃ antagonist/H₁ agonist) on learning and memory, and associated brain activity were assessed. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Sixteen healthy volunteers (eight female) aged between 18 and 50 years received two p.o. doses of betahistine (48 mg) or placebo separated by 30 min, on separate days according to a two-way, double-blind, crossover design. Volunteers performed an N-back working memory task and a spatial paired associates learning task while being scanned using a MRI scanner. KEY

resultsTask-related activity changes in well-defined networks and performance were observed. No betahistine-induced changes in brain activity were found in these networks. Alternatively, liberal whole-brain analyses showed activity changes in areas outside task networks, like the lateral geniculate nucleus. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Clear effects of betahistine on working memory could not be established. Future studies should use higher doses and explore the role of histamine in visual information processing.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdolescentAdultBetahistineBrainCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHistamine AgonistsHistamine H3 AntagonistsHumansLearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMemory, Short-TermMiddle AgedBetahistineHistamine AgonistsHistamine H3 AntagonistsbetahistineH1 agonistH3 antagonisthistaminehuman cognitionimaginglearningmemoryMRI

Identifiers

PMID23517178
PMCPMC3764856
OpenAlexW2117505652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.