ArticlePloS one2013
A quantitative measure of electrostatic perturbation in holo and apo enzymes induced by structural changes.
Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biological pathways are subject to subtle manipulations that achieve a wide range of functional variation in differing physiological niches. In many instances, changes in the structure of an enzyme on ligand binding germinate electrostatic perturbations that form the basis of its changed catalytic or transcriptional efficiency. Computational methods that seek to gain insights into the electrostatic changes in enzymes require expertise to setup and computing prowess. In the current work, we present a fast, easy and reliable methodology to compute electrostatic perturbations induced by ligand binding (MEPP). The theoretical foundation of MEPP is the conserved electrostatic potential difference (EPD) in cognate pairs of active site residues in proteins with the same functionality. Previously, this invariance has been used to unravel promiscuous serine protease and metallo-β-lactamase scaffolds in alkaline phosphatases. Given that a similarity in EPD is significant, we expect differences in the EPD to be significant too. MEPP identifies residues or domains that undergo significant electrostatic perturbations, and also enumerates residue pairs that undergo significant polarity change. The gain in a certain polarity of a residue with respect to neighboring residues, or the reversal of polarity between two residues might indicate a change in the preferred ligand. The methodology of MEPP has been demonstrated on several enzymes that employ varying mechanisms to perform their roles. For example, we have attributed the change in polarity in residue pairs to be responsible for the loss of metal ion binding in fructose 1,6-bisphosphatases, and corroborated the pre-organized state of the active site of the enzyme with respect to functionally relevant changes in electric fields in ketosteroid isomerases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.