Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23516529›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Aggressive regimens for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis decrease all-cause mortality.

Carole D Mitnick, Molly F Franke, Michael L Rich, Felix A Alcantara Viru, Sasha C Appleton, Sidney S Atwood, Jaime N Bayona, Cesar A Bonilla, Katiuska Chalco, Hamish S F Fraser and 15 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Clinical outcomes among patients with tuberculous meningitis receiving intensified treatment regimens.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Totality of outcomes: A different paradigm in assessing interventions for treatment of tuberculosis.Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2016
    Article
  18. Presumptive treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in household contacts.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2016
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Carole D MitnickDepartment of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America. carole_mitnick@hms.harvard.edu
Molly F Franke
Michael L Rich
Felix A Alcantara Viru
Sasha C Appleton
Sidney S Atwood
Jaime N Bayona
Cesar A Bonilla
Katiuska Chalco
Hamish S F Fraser
Jennifer J Furin
Dalia Guerra
Rocio M Hurtado
Keith Joseph
Karim Llaro
Lorena Mestanza
Joia S Mukherjee
Maribel Muñoz
Eda Palacios
Epifanio Sanchez
Kwonjune J Seung
Sonya S Shin
Alexander Sloutsky
Arielle W Tolman
Mercedes C Becerra
Partners In Health · USEsSALUD · PEBrigham and Women's Hospital · USHarvard University · USCase Western Reserve University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USMinistry of Health · PEUniversidad Privada Sergio Bernales · PE

Funding

Clinical Outcomes Research in MDR-TBK01AI065836 · NIAID · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI MITNICK, CAROLE D. · 2006 to 2008
$346k
NIAID NIH HHS 1 K01 AI065836-01NIAID NIH HHS K01 AI065836
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleA better understanding of the composition of optimal treatment regimens for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) is essential for expanding universal access to effective treatment and for developing new therapies for MDR-TB. Analysis of observational data may inform the definition of an optimized regimen.

objectivesThis study assessed the impact of an aggressive regimen-one containing at least five likely effective drugs, including a fluoroquinolone and injectable-on treatment outcomes in a large MDR-TB patient cohort.

methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study of patients treated in a national outpatient program in Peru between 1999 and 2002. We examined the association between receiving an aggressive regimen and the rate of death. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsIn total, 669 patients were treated with individualized regimens for laboratory-confirmed MDR-TB. Isolates were resistant to a mean of 5.4 (SD 1.7) drugs. Cure or completion was achieved in 66.1% (442) of patients; death occurred in 20.8% (139). Patients who received an aggressive regimen were less likely to die (crude hazard ratio [HR]: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.44,0.89), compared to those who did not receive such a regimen. This association held in analyses adjusted for comorbidities and indicators of severity (adjusted HR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.43,0.93).

conclusionsThe aggressive regimen is a robust predictor of MDR-TB treatment outcome. TB policy makers and program directors should consider this standard as they design and implement regimens for patients with drug-resistant disease. Furthermore, the aggressive regimen should be considered the standard background regimen when designing randomized trials of treatment for drug-resistant TB.

Indexed as

Analysis of VarianceAntitubercular AgentsFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeTuberculosis, Multidrug-ResistantAntitubercular Agents

Identifiers

PMID23516529
PMCPMC3596279
OpenAlexW2171417449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.