Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23516441›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2013

Predicting the electron requirement for carbon fixation in seas and oceans.

Evelyn Lawrenz, Greg Silsbe, Elisa Capuzzo, Pasi Ylöstalo, Rodney M Forster, Stefan G H Simis, Ondřej Prášil, Jacco C Kromkamp, Anna E Hickman, C Mark Moore and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Chlorophyll fluorometry in evaluating photosynthetic performance: key limitations, possibilities, perspectives and alternatives.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Exploring Variability ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Vertical structure in chlorophyll profiles: influence on primary production in the Arctic Ocean.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 7 countries.

Evelyn LawrenzLaboratory of Photosynthesis, Institute of Microbiology, ASCR (Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic), Opatovický mlýn, Třeboň, Czech Republic. lawrenz@alga.cz
Greg Silsbe
Elisa Capuzzo
Pasi Ylöstalo
Rodney M Forster
Stefan G H Simis
Ondřej Prášil
Jacco C Kromkamp
Anna E Hickman
C Mark Moore
Marie-Hélèn Forget
Richard J Geider
David J Suggett
Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science · GBCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Microbiology · CZFinnish Environment Institute · FINetherlands Institute of Ecology · NLUniversity of Essex · GBUniversity of Southampton · GBUniversité Laval · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Marine phytoplankton account for about 50% of all global net primary productivity (NPP). Active fluorometry, mainly Fast Repetition Rate fluorometry (FRRf), has been advocated as means of providing high resolution estimates of NPP. However, not measuring CO2-fixation directly, FRRf instead provides photosynthetic quantum efficiency estimates from which electron transfer rates (ETR) and ultimately CO2-fixation rates can be derived. Consequently, conversions of ETRs to CO2-fixation requires knowledge of the electron requirement for carbon fixation (Φe,C, ETR/CO2 uptake rate) and its dependence on environmental gradients. Such knowledge is critical for large scale implementation of active fluorescence to better characterise CO2-uptake. Here we examine the variability of experimentally determined Φe,C values in relation to key environmental variables with the aim of developing new working algorithms for the calculation of Φe,C from environmental variables. Coincident FRRf and (14)C-uptake and environmental data from 14 studies covering 12 marine regions were analysed via a meta-analytical, non-parametric, multivariate approach. Combining all studies, Φe,C varied between 1.15 and 54.2 mol e(-) (mol C)(-1) with a mean of 10.9 ± 6.91 mol e(-) mol C)(-1). Although variability of Φe,C was related to environmental gradients at global scales, region-specific analyses provided far improved predictive capability. However, use of regional Φ e,C algorithms requires objective means of defining regions of interest, which remains challenging. Considering individual studies and specific small-scale regions, temperature, nutrient and light availability were correlated with Φ e,C albeit to varying degrees and depending on the study/region and the composition of the extant phytoplankton community. At the level of large biogeographic regions and distinct water masses, Φ e,C was related to nutrient availability, chlorophyll, as well as temperature and/or salinity in most regions, while light availability was also important in Baltic Sea and shelf waters. The novel Φ e,C algorithms provide a major step forward for widespread fluorometry-based NPP estimates and highlight the need for further studying the natural variability of Φe,C to verify and develop algorithms with improved accuracy.

Indexed as

Carbon CycleElectronsBacteriaEcosystemEnvironmentGeographyNitratesPhytoplanktonSeawaterSpatio-Temporal AnalysisNitrates

Identifiers

PMID23516441
PMCPMC3596381
OpenAlexW2093678097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.