Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23516347›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2013

Functional knowledge transfer for high-accuracy prediction of under-studied biological processes.

Christopher Y Park, Aaron K Wong, Casey S Greene, Jessica Rowland, Yuanfang Guan, Lars A Bongo, Rebecca D Burdine, Olga G Troyanskaya

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Opportunities and obstacles for deep learning in biology and medicine.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2018
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Christopher Y ParkDepartment of Computer Science, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
Aaron K Wong
Casey S Greene
Jessica Rowland
Yuanfang Guan
Lars A Bongo
Rebecca D Burdine
Olga G Troyanskaya
Princeton University · USMichigan United · USUiT The Arctic University of Norway · NO

Funding

Spatial Patterning During DevelopmentP50GM071508 · NIGMS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI POWELL, SUSAN M · 2004 to 2013
$30.6M
Quantitavie and Computational Biology Graduate ProgramT32HG003284 · NHGRI · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI Joshua Michael Akey, Stanislav Y. Shvartsman · 2004 to 2026
$9.9M
lntegration and Visualization of Diverse Biological DataR01GM071966 · NIGMS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI TROYANSKAYA, OLGA G · 2005 to 2022
$6.4M
Connecting Polycystin Signaling to Asymmetric Nodal ExpressionR01HD048584 · NICHD · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI BURDINE, REBECCA D. · 2007 to 2016
$3.5M
Context-Sensitive Search of Human Expression CompendiaR01HG005998 · NHGRI · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI TROYANSKAYA, OLGA G · 2011 to 2013
$1.1M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG005998NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG003284NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD048584NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM071508NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM071966
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A key challenge in genetics is identifying the functional roles of genes in pathways. Numerous functional genomics techniques (e.g. machine learning) that predict protein function have been developed to address this question. These methods generally build from existing annotations of genes to pathways and thus are often unable to identify additional genes participating in processes that are not already well studied. Many of these processes are well studied in some organism, but not necessarily in an investigator's organism of interest. Sequence-based search methods (e.g. BLAST) have been used to transfer such annotation information between organisms. We demonstrate that functional genomics can complement traditional sequence similarity to improve the transfer of gene annotations between organisms. Our method transfers annotations only when functionally appropriate as determined by genomic data and can be used with any prediction algorithm to combine transferred gene function knowledge with organism-specific high-throughput data to enable accurate function prediction. We show that diverse state-of-art machine learning algorithms leveraging functional knowledge transfer (FKT) dramatically improve their accuracy in predicting gene-pathway membership, particularly for processes with little experimental knowledge in an organism. We also show that our method compares favorably to annotation transfer by sequence similarity. Next, we deploy FKT with state-of-the-art SVM classifier to predict novel genes to 11,000 biological processes across six diverse organisms and expand the coverage of accurate function predictions to processes that are often ignored because of a dearth of annotated genes in an organism. Finally, we perform in vivo experimental investigation in Danio rerio and confirm the regulatory role of our top predicted novel gene, wnt5b, in leftward cell migration during heart development. FKT is immediately applicable to many bioinformatics techniques and will help biologists systematically integrate prior knowledge from diverse systems to direct targeted experiments in their organism of study.

Indexed as

Biological PhenomenaModels, BiologicalAnimalsBayes TheoremCaenorhabditis elegansComputational BiologyDrosophila melanogasterEmbryonic DevelopmentEmbryo, NonmammalianGenesHumansMiceModels, StatisticalRatsSequence Analysis, DNASupport Vector Machine

Identifiers

PMID23516347
PMCPMC3597527
OpenAlexW2084955942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.