ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2013
Cranial nerves XIII and XIV: nerves in the shadows.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Examination of the effect of fascial therapy on some physical fitness parameters in taekwondo athletes.Sports medicine and health science · 2023Article
- Ergojump evaluation of the explosive strength in volleyball athletes pre- and post-fascial treatment.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2019Article
- Samuel Thomas von Sömmerring's Contributions on the Cranial Nerves and Vomeronasal Organ.Cureus · 2018Article
- Review
- Understanding Fibroblasts in Order to Comprehend the Osteopathic Treatment of the Fascia.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2015Review
- Clinical and symptomatological reflections: the fascial system.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2014Article
- Skin, fascias, and scars: symptoms and systemic connections.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It has been known for over a century that these cranial nerves exist, and that they are not typographical errors nor a sensational event reported in the medical literature. A number of scientific articles on anatomy highlight how textbooks on descriptive anatomy do not always consider variables such as differences related to the geographical areas where people live, and these differences do exist. This is an important concept not only for surgeons, but also for all medical professionals who use manual techniques when treating their patients, ie, osteopaths, chiropractors, physiotherapists, and other manual therapists. This paper highlights the latest developments regarding these cranial nerves, offering at the same time some ideas for further reflection when looking at clinical scenarios that appear to bear little relationship to each other. Inclusion of these concepts in everyday anamnesis is encouraged.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.