Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23515411›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2013

A phase I trial of vorinostat and alvocidib in patients with relapsed, refractory, or poor prognosis acute leukemia, or refractory anemia with excess blasts-2.

Beata Holkova, Jeffrey G Supko, Matthew M Ames, Joel M Reid, Geoffrey I Shapiro, Edward Brent Perkins, Viswanathan Ramakrishnan, Mary Beth Tombes, Connie Honeycutt, Renee M McGovern and 8 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Electrophysiology Translational Considerations in Cardio-Oncology: QT and Beyond.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2020
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. New advances in targeted gastric cancer treatment.World journal of gastroenterology · 2016
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Molecular targeted therapy for the treatment of gastric cancer.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2016
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Rational Combinations of Targeted Agents in AML.Journal of clinical medicine · 2015
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Managing Tumor Lysis Syndrome in the Era of Novel Cancer Therapies.Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Beata HolkovaMassey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA. bholkova@mcvh-vcu.edu
Jeffrey G Supko
Matthew M Ames
Joel M Reid
Geoffrey I Shapiro
Edward Brent Perkins
Viswanathan Ramakrishnan
Mary Beth Tombes
Connie Honeycutt
Renee M McGovern
Maciej Kmieciak
Ellen Shrader
Martha D Wellons
Heidi Sankala
Austin Doyle
John Wright
John D Roberts
Steven Grant
National Cancer Institute · USMayo Clinic · USVirginia Commonwealth University · USDana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center · USUNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center

Funding

Women's Cancer ProgramP30CA015083 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Felicity Enders · 1985 to 2026
$151.3M
Virus Vector Shared ResourceP30CA016059 · NCI · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI Keri R Maher · 1985 to 2026
$51.0M
X-LINKED HYPOPHOSPHATEMIAM01RR000065 · NCRR · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI SANYAL, ARUN J · 1985 to 2010
$24.8M
PHASE I CLINICAL TRIALS OF ANTICANCER AGENTSU01CA069912 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI ERLICHMAN, CHARLES · 1995 to 2013
$10.1M
NF-kappaB Inhibitors and Differentiation-Inducers in LeukemiaR01CA093738 · NCI · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI GRANT, STEVEN · 2002 to 2011
$2.4M
CDK/histone deacetylase inhibition in acute leukemiaR21CA115260 · NCI · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI GRANT, STEVEN · 2005 to 2006
$529k
INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON AROMATIC HYDROCARBONSR13CA060516 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI CAVALIERI, ERCOLE L · 1993 to 1993
–
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015083NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016059NCI NIH HHS P30 CA15083NCI NIH HHS P30 CA60516NCI NIH HHS R01 CA093738NCI NIH HHS R01 CA93738NCI NIH HHS R21 CA115260NCI NIH HHS U01 CA069912NCI NIH HHS U01 CA69912NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR000065NCRR NIH HHS M01RR00065PHS HHS 23XS026
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis phase I study was conducted to identify the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of alvocidib when combined with vorinostat in patients with relapsed, refractory, or poor prognosis acute leukemia, or refractory anemia with excess blasts-2. Secondary objectives included investigating the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of the combination. EXPERIMENTAL

designPatients received vorinostat (200 mg orally, three times a day, for 14 days) on a 21-day cycle, combined with 2 different alvocidib administration schedules: a 1-hour intravenous infusion, daily × 5; or a 30-minute loading infusion followed by a 4-hour maintenance infusion, weekly × 2. The alvocidib dose was escalated using a standard 3+3 design.

resultsTwenty-eight patients were enrolled and treated. The alvocidib MTD was 20 mg/m(2) (30-minute loading infusion) followed by 20 mg/m(2) (4-hour maintenance infusion) on days one and eight, in combination with vorinostat. The most frequently encountered toxicities were cytopenias, fatigue, hyperglycemia, hypokalemia, hypophosphatemia, and QT prolongation. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) were cardiac arrhythmia-atrial fibrillation and QT prolongation. No objective responses were achieved although 13 of 26 evaluable patients exhibited stable disease. Alvocidib seemed to alter vorinostat pharmacokinetics, whereas alvocidib pharmacokinetics were unaffected by vorinostat. Ex vivo exposure of leukemia cells to plasma obtained from patients after alvocidib treatment blocked vorinostat-mediated p21(CIP1) induction and downregulated Mcl-1 and p-RNA Pol II for some specimens, although parallel in vivo bone marrow responses were infrequent.

conclusionsAlvocidib combined with vorinostat is well tolerated. Although disease stabilization occurred in some heavily pretreated patients, objective responses were not obtained with these schedules.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAdultAgedAnemia, Refractory, with Excess of BlastsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCell Line, TumorCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21FemaleFlavonoidsHumansHydroxamic AcidsLeukemiaMaleMaximum Tolerated DoseMiddle AgedMyeloid Cell Leukemia Sequence 1 ProteinalvocidibCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21FlavonoidsHydroxamic AcidsMyeloid Cell Leukemia Sequence 1 ProteinPiperidinesProto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2RNA Polymerase IIVorinostat

Identifiers

PMID23515411
PMCPMC3618599
OpenAlexW2166896554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.