Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23515335›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2013

Ten years of tiotropium: clinical impact and patient perspectives.

Abebaw M Yohannes, Martin J Connolly, Nicola A Hanania

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Bronchodilator efficacy of 18 μg once-daily tiotropium inhalation via DiscairInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2016
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Long-term safety of tiotropium delivered by RespimatTherapeutics and clinical risk management · 2016
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. The inevitable drift to triple therapy in COPD: an analysis of prescribing pathways in the UK.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2015
    Observational
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Abebaw M YohannesManchester Metropolitan University, Department of Health Professions, UK. a.yohannes@mmu.ac.uk
Martin J Connolly
Nicola A Hanania
Baylor College of Medicine · USManchester Metropolitan University · GBUniversity of Auckland · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tiotropium bromide is an anticholinergic agent that has gained worldwide acceptance as a first-line, once daily maintenance therapy for patients with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The purpose of this review is to synthesize the evidence base in the past 10 years on the development of tiotropium and its efficacy compared to other able interventions such as long-acting beta agonists (LABAs), as well as to assess its safety profile and its effects on health-related outcomes in patients with COPD. Treatment with tiotropium bromide has generally improved patients' health-related quality of life, reduced the number of patients suffering from acute exacerbations, decreased the number of hospitalizations, improved dyspnea, and reduced adverse events compared to placebo. In the past decade, several studies have examined the safety and efficacy of tiotropium in comparison to placebo and to LABAs (salmeterol, formoterol, and indacaterol) over periods ranging from 3 months to 48 months of follow-up. Head-to-head comparisons of tiotropium 18μg (once daily) with salmeterol 50μg (twice daily) in well-controlled trials demonstrated that tiotropium was superior in reducing acute exacerbation events and in improving quality of life. In a few short-term studies, indacaterol was comparable to tiotropium in its efficacy in improving health-related outcomes. Although the safety record of tiotropium has been exemplary in comparison to placebo, anticholinergic events such as dry mouth can be encountered in some patients. While the long-term safety of tiotropium when delivered in the HandiHaler® has been well documented, its delivery using the Respimat® Soft Mist Inhaler™ was associated with an elevated risk of cardiovascular complications, including increased mortality when compared to placebo. The exact mechanism for this is not known but is being investigated in a large multinational study that will evaluate the long-term safety of different doses of tiotropium delivered by the Respimat® soft mist inhaler versus the HandiHaler®. Further studies are required to investigate the efficacy and safety of tiotropium in comparison with novel LABAs such as indacaterol and vilanterol, and with other emerging novel anticholinergic agents such as aclidinium bromide and NVA237 (glycopyrronium bromide).

Indexed as

Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor AgonistsAlbuterolBronchodilator AgentsDyspneaEthanolaminesFormoterol FumarateHumansIndansMedication AdherenceMucociliary ClearanceNebulizers and VaporizersPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveQuality of LifeQuinolonesSalmeterol XinafoateScopolamine DerivativesAdrenergic beta-2 Receptor AgonistsAlbuterolBronchodilator AgentsEthanolaminesFormoterol FumarateindacaterolIndansQuinolonesSalmeterol XinafoateScopolamine DerivativesTiotropium Bromidebronchodilatorchronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseindacaterolLABAsalmeteroltiotropium

Identifiers

PMID23515335
PMCPMC3600941
OpenAlexW2047229555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.