ArticleArchives of medical science : AMS2013
Prognostic importance of some clinical and therapeutic factors for the effect of portal vein embolization in patients with primarily inoperable colorectal liver metastases.
Article in Archives of medical science : AMS, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Predictive Factors for Hypertrophy of the Future Liver Remnant After Portal Vein Embolization: A Systematic Review.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2021Pooled it
- Negative impact of chemotherapy on kinetic growth rate of the future liver remnant if applied following PVE or ALPPS.PloS one · 2025Article
- Investigation of clinicopathological parameters in emergency colorectal cancer surgery: a study of 67 patients.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2017Article
- Laparoscopic and open liver resection - a literature review with meta-analysis.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2017Review
- Nutritional risk screening 2002 and ASA score predict mortality after elective liver resection for malignancy.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2017Article
- Portal vein embolization effect on colorectal cancer liver metastasis progression: Lessons learned.World journal of clinical oncology · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPortal vein embolization (PVE) may increase the resectability of liver metastases. However, the problem of PVE is insufficient growth of the liver or tumor progression in some patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the significance of commonly available clinical factors for the result of PVE. MATERIAL AND
methodsPortal vein embolization was performed in 38 patients with colorectal liver metastases. Effects of age, gender, time between PVE and liver resection, oncological therapy after PVE, indocyanine green retention rate test, synchronous, metachronous and extrahepatic metastases, liver volume before and after PVE, increase of liver volume after PVE and the quality of liver parenchyma before PVE on the result of PVE were evaluated.
resultsLiver resection was performed in 23 (62.2%) patients within 1.3 ±0.4 months after PVE. Tumor progression occurred in 9 (23.7%) patients and 6 (15.8%) patients had insufficient liver hypertrophy. Significant clinical factors of PVE failure were number of liver metastases (cut-off - 4; odds ratio - 4.7; p < 0.03), liver volume after PVE (cut-off 1000 cm(3); odds ratio - 5.1; p < 0.02), growth of liver volume after PVE (cut-off 150 cm(3); odds ratio - 18.7; p < 0.002), oncological therapy administered concomitantly with PVE (p < 0.003).
conclusionsNegative clinical factors of resectability of colorectal cancer liver metastases after PVE included more than four liver metastases, liver volume after PVE < 1000 cm(3), growth of the contralateral lobe by less than 150 cm(3) and concurrent oncological therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.