Defining 'coeliac': Oslo Accord--or not?

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

1. Microscopic enteritis: Bucharest consensus.World journal of gastroenterology · 2015
   Guideline
2. Pathological Manifestations of Gluten-Related Neuro-Psychiatric Disorders and the Impact of Gluten-Free Diet in a Pediatric Age Group: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2023
   Review
3. Coeliac disease, mucosal change and IEL: doing what counts the best.Gastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench · 2016
   Article
4. Mucosal histopathology in celiac disease: a rebuttal of Oberhuber's sub-division of Marsh III.Gastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench · 2015
   Review
5. What is the best histopathological classification for celiac disease? Does it matter?Gastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench · 2015
   Article
6. Rebutting Oberhuber- Again.Gastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench · 2015
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  The Oslo definitions for coeliac disease and related terms.2013

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as