Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23514746›Full record

ArticleBioResearch open access2012

Human xenografts are not rejected in a naturally occurring immunodeficient porcine line: a human tumor model in pigs.

Matthew T Basel, Sivasai Balivada, Amanda P Beck, Maureen A Kerrigan, Marla M Pyle, Jack C M Dekkers, Carol R Wyatt, Robert R R Rowland, David E Anderson, Stefan H Bossmann and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioResearch open access, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Swine models for translational oncological research: an evolving landscape and regulatory considerations.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. SCID pigs: An emerging large animal NK model.Journal of rare diseases research & treatment · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew T BaselDepartment of Anatomy and Physiology, Kansas State University , Manhattan, Kansas.
Sivasai Balivada
Amanda P Beck
Maureen A Kerrigan
Marla M Pyle
Jack C M Dekkers
Carol R Wyatt
Robert R R Rowland
David E Anderson
Stefan H Bossmann
Deryl L Troyer
Kansas State University · USIowa State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal models for cancer therapy are invaluable for preclinical testing of potential cancer treatments; however, therapies tested in such models often fail to translate into clinical settings. Therefore, a better preclinical model for cancer treatment testing is needed. Here we demonstrate that an immunodeficient line of pigs can host and support the growth of xenografted human tumors and has the potential to be an effective animal model for cancer therapy. Wild-type and immunodeficient pigs were injected subcutaneously in the left ear with human melanoma cells (A375SM cells) and in the right ear with human pancreatic carcinoma cells (PANC-1). All immunodeficient pigs developed tumors that were verified by histology and immunohistochemistry. Nonaffected littermates did not develop tumors. Immunodeficient pigs, which do not reject xenografted human tumors, have the potential to become an extremely useful animal model for cancer therapy because of their similarity in size, anatomy, and physiology to humans.

Indexed as

immunodeficient swinelarge-animal cancer modelmelanomapancreatic carcinomaxenografts

Identifiers

PMID23514746
PMCPMC3559234
OpenAlexW2031712049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.