ArticleBMC bioinformatics2013
MS-kNN: protein function prediction by integrating multiple data sources.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Systematic analysis and prediction of type IV secreted effector proteins by machine learning approaches.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2019Pooled it
- On the state of protein function prediction: a report on the fourth CAFA challenge.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Struct2GO-Enhanced: Multimodal Graph Attention Improves Protein Function Prediction.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- EZpred: improving deep learning-based enzyme function prediction using unlabeled sequence homologs.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Struct2GO: protein function prediction based on graph pooling algorithm and AlphaFold2 structure information.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- HNetGO: protein function prediction via heterogeneous network transformer.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Integrating unsupervised language model with triplet neural networks for protein gene ontology prediction.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- PreAcrs: a machine learning framework for identifying anti-CRISPR proteins.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Identifying SNARE Proteins Using an Alignment-Free Method Based on Multiscan Convolutional Neural Network and PSSM Profiles.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2022Article
- Article
- EnsembleFam: towards more accurate protein family prediction in the twilight zone.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- QAUST: Protein Function Prediction Using Structure Similarity, Protein Interaction, and Functional Motifs.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Incorporating Machine Learning into Established Bioinformatics Frameworks.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Protein function prediction with gene ontology: from traditional to deep learning models.PeerJ · 2021Article
- Review
- Protein functional annotation of simultaneously improved stability, accuracy and false discovery rate achieved by a sequence-based deep learning.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2020Article
- The ortholog conjecture revisited: the value of orthologs and paralogs in function prediction.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2020Article
- Metric learning on expression data for gene function prediction.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2020Article
- Identification of Proteins of Tobacco Mosaic Virus by Using a Method of Feature Extraction.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProtein function determination is a key challenge in the post-genomic era. Experimental determination of protein functions is accurate, but time-consuming and resource-intensive. A cost-effective alternative is to use the known information about sequence, structure, and functional properties of genes and proteins to predict functions using statistical methods. In this paper, we describe the Multi-Source k-Nearest Neighbor (MS-kNN) algorithm for function prediction, which finds k-nearest neighbors of a query protein based on different types of similarity measures and predicts its function by weighted averaging of its neighbors' functions. Specifically, we used 3 data sources to calculate the similarity scores: sequence similarity, protein-protein interactions, and gene expressions.
resultsWe report the results in the context of 2011 Critical Assessment of Function Annotation (CAFA). Prior to CAFA submission deadline, we evaluated our algorithm on 1,302 human test proteins that were represented in all 3 data sources. Using only the sequence similarity information, MS-kNN had term-based Area Under the Curve (AUC) accuracy of Gene Ontology (GO) molecular function predictions of 0.728 when 7,412 human training proteins were used, and 0.819 when 35,622 training proteins from multiple eukaryotic and prokaryotic organisms were used. By aggregating predictions from all three sources, the AUC was further improved to 0.848. Similar result was observed on prediction of GO biological processes. Testing on 595 proteins that were annotated after the CAFA submission deadline showed that overall MS-kNN accuracy was higher than that of baseline algorithms Gotcha and BLAST, which were based solely on sequence similarity information. Since only 10 of the 595 proteins were represented by all 3 data sources, and 66 by two data sources, the difference between 3-source and one-source MS-kNN was rather small.
conclusionsBased on our results, we have several useful insights: (1) the k-nearest neighbor algorithm is an efficient and effective model for protein function prediction; (2) it is beneficial to transfer functions across a wide range of organisms; (3) it is helpful to integrate multiple sources of protein information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.