Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23514130›Full record

ArticleBMC medical ethics2013

Patients as consumers of health care in South Africa: the ethical and legal implications.

Kirsten Rowe, Keymanthri Moodley

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical ethics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
193.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Addressing communication dynamics in traditional medicine use disclosure to physicians.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Who really decides? Feeding decisions 'made' by caregivers of children with cerebral palsy.The South African journal of communication disorders = Die Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir Kommunikasieafwykings · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. EVANGELICALISM IN UGANDA: IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC HEALTH AND BIOETHICS.Journal of intercultural management and ethics · 2021
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Physiotherapist-patient communication in entry-level physiotherapy education: A national survey in Nigeria.Hong Kong physiotherapy journal : official publication of the Hong Kong Physiotherapy Association Limited = Wu li chih liao · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Addressing change in physiotherapy education in South Africa.The South African journal of physiotherapy · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. A structuration framework for bridging the macro-micro divide in health-care governance.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2016
    Review
  19. Article
  20. The main indicators for Iranian hospital ethical accreditation.Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kirsten RoweCentre for Medical Ethics and Law, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Tygerberg Campus, Cape Town, South Africa. kirstenrowe@gmail.com
Keymanthri Moodley
Stellenbosch University · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSouth Africa currently has a pluralistic health care system with separate public and private sectors. It is, however, moving towards a socialised model with the introduction of National Health Insurance. The South African legislative environment has changed recently with the promulgation of the Consumer Protection Act and proposed amendments to the National Health Act. Patients can now be viewed as consumers from a legal perspective. This has various implications for health care systems, health care providers and the doctor-patient relationship. DISCUSSION: Calling a recipient of health care a 'consumer' as opposed to a 'patient' has distinct connotations and may result in differential behaviour. Labels reflect the ideals of the context in which they are used. Various models of the doctor-patient relationship exist and different metaphors have been used to describe it. Increasingly there are third parties involved within the doctor-patient relationship making it more difficult for the doctor to play the fiduciary role. In certain parts of the world, there has been a shift from a traditional paternalistic model to a consumerist model. The ethical implications of the commodification of health care are complex. As health care becomes a 'product' supplied by the health care 'provider', there is the risk that doctors will replace professional ethics with those of the marketplace. Health care is a universal human need and cannot be considered a mere commodity. In modern medical ethics, great emphasis is placed on the principle of respect for patient autonomy. Patients are now the ultimate decision-makers. The new Consumer Protection Act in South Africa applies to consumers and patients alike. It enforces strict liability for harm caused by goods and services. Everyone in the supply chain, including the doctor, can be held jointly and severally liable. This may lead to enormous challenges in health care delivery. SUMMARY: Viewing patients as consumers may be detrimental to the doctor-patient relationship. While it facilitates an emphasis on respect for patient autonomy, it inadvertently results in the commodification of health care. The new legislative environment in South Africa promotes the protection of patient rights. It may, however, contribute to increased medical litigation.

Indexed as

CommodificationCommunity ParticipationPersonal AutonomyDelivery of Health CareHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Status DisparitiesHumansNational Health ProgramsPatient RightsPhysician-Patient RelationsSocial ResponsibilitySouth AfricaTerminology as TopicTrust

Identifiers

PMID23514130
PMCPMC3614872
OpenAlexW2123420379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.