ArticleBioData mining2013
Using Bayesian networks to discover relations between genes, environment, and disease.
Article in BioData mining, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating host-microbiome multi-omics with machine learning: methods, benchmarks, and translational applications.Science China. Life sciences · 2026Review
- Adaptive modelling approach for predicting causes of death: insights from verbal autopsy data in Tanzania.International health · 2026Article
- AI-based methods for the assessment of DNA damage and repair mechanisms.Frontiers in systems biology · 2026Review
- An Introduction to Network Analysis in Plant Biology.Plant direct · 2025Article
- General framework of nonlinear factor interactions using bayesian networks for risk analysis applied to road safety and public health.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Bayesian Networks for Prescreening in Depression: Algorithm Development and Validation.JMIR mental health · 2024Article
- Pharmacokinetic and neuroimmune pharmacogenetic impacts on slow-release morphine cancer pain control and adverse effects.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2024Article
- Multi-source multi-modal markers for Bayesian Networks: Application to the extremely preterm born brain.Medical image analysis · 2024Article
- Gene-environment interactions and preterm birth predictors: A Bayesian network approach.Genetics and molecular biology · 2024Article
- Choosing the right treatment - combining clinicians' expert knowledge with data-driven predictions.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Article
- Article
- CausNet: generational orderings based search for optimal Bayesian networks via dynamic programming with parent set constraints.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Identifying Associations in Minimum Inhibitory Concentration Values ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2022Article
- STS-BN: An efficient Bayesian network method for detecting causal SNPs.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Identifying large-scale interaction atlases using probabilistic graphs and external knowledge.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2022Article
- A mathematical model for strigolactone biosynthesis in plants.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Improved Local Search with Momentum for Bayesian Networks Structure Learning.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Understanding racial disparities in severe maternal morbidity using Bayesian network analysis.PloS one · 2021Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We review the applicability of Bayesian networks (BNs) for discovering relations between genes, environment, and disease. By translating probabilistic dependencies among variables into graphical models and vice versa, BNs provide a comprehensible and modular framework for representing complex systems. We first describe the Bayesian network approach and its applicability to understanding the genetic and environmental basis of disease. We then describe a variety of algorithms for learning the structure of a network from observational data. Because of their relevance to real-world applications, the topics of missing data and causal interpretation are emphasized. The BN approach is then exemplified through application to data from a population-based study of bladder cancer in New Hampshire, USA. For didactical purposes, we intentionally keep this example simple. When applied to complete data records, we find only minor differences in the performance and results of different algorithms. Subsequent incorporation of partial records through application of the EM algorithm gives us greater power to detect relations. Allowing for network structures that depart from a strict causal interpretation also enhances our ability to discover complex associations including gene-gene (epistasis) and gene-environment interactions. While BNs are already powerful tools for the genetic dissection of disease and generation of prognostic models, there remain some conceptual and computational challenges. These include the proper handling of continuous variables and unmeasured factors, the explicit incorporation of prior knowledge, and the evaluation and communication of the robustness of substantive conclusions to alternative assumptions and data manifestations.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.