Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23514120›Full record

ArticleBioData mining2013

Using Bayesian networks to discover relations between genes, environment, and disease.

Chengwei Su, Angeline Andrew, Margaret R Karagas, Mark E Borsuk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioData mining, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chengwei SuThayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA. mark.borsuk@dartmouth.edu.
Angeline Andrew
Margaret R Karagas
Mark E Borsuk

Funding

NONMELANOMA SKIN CANCER IN NEW HAMPSHIRER01CA057494 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI KARAGAS, MARGARET RITA · 1993 to 2015
$10.9M
Quantitative Biology Research InstituteP20GM103534 · NIGMS · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI AMOS, CHRISTOPHER I. · 2012 to 2016
$8.6M
QUANTITATIVE BIOLOGY RESEARCH INSTITUTEP20RR024475 · NCRR · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI MOORE, JASON H. · 2011 to 2011
$2.3M
Bladder Cancer Prognostic IndicatorsK07CA102327 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI ANDREW, ANGELINE SANDERSON · 2005 to 2009
$819k
DNA Repair and Bladder CancerR03CA099500 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI ANDREW, ANGELINE SANDERSON · 2003 to 2004
$158k
Comprehensive Assessment of Bladder Cancer Genetic SusceptibilityR03CA121382 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI ANDREW, ANGELINE SANDERSON · 2006 to 2007
$158k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA102327NCI NIH HHS R01 CA057494NCI NIH HHS R03 CA099500NCI NIH HHS R03 CA121382NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR024475NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103534
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We review the applicability of Bayesian networks (BNs) for discovering relations between genes, environment, and disease. By translating probabilistic dependencies among variables into graphical models and vice versa, BNs provide a comprehensible and modular framework for representing complex systems. We first describe the Bayesian network approach and its applicability to understanding the genetic and environmental basis of disease. We then describe a variety of algorithms for learning the structure of a network from observational data. Because of their relevance to real-world applications, the topics of missing data and causal interpretation are emphasized. The BN approach is then exemplified through application to data from a population-based study of bladder cancer in New Hampshire, USA. For didactical purposes, we intentionally keep this example simple. When applied to complete data records, we find only minor differences in the performance and results of different algorithms. Subsequent incorporation of partial records through application of the EM algorithm gives us greater power to detect relations. Allowing for network structures that depart from a strict causal interpretation also enhances our ability to discover complex associations including gene-gene (epistasis) and gene-environment interactions. While BNs are already powerful tools for the genetic dissection of disease and generation of prognostic models, there remain some conceptual and computational challenges. These include the proper handling of continuous variables and unmeasured factors, the explicit incorporation of prior knowledge, and the evaluation and communication of the robustness of substantive conclusions to alternative assumptions and data manifestations.

Identifiers

PMID23514120
PMCPMC3614442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.