ArticleBMC bioinformatics2013
Protein function prediction by massive integration of evolutionary analyses and multiple data sources.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed.
- How far can you go? Extrapolating values of catalytic activity from known protein landscapes in natural and directed evolution.Chemical Society reviews · 2026Review
- MAGIN-GO: Protein function prediction based on dual graph neural networks and gene ontology structure.PloS one · 2026Article
- Current status and emerging frontiers in enzyme engineering: An industrial perspective.Heliyon · 2024Review
- CFAGO: cross-fusion of network and attributes based on attention mechanism for protein function prediction.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Machine learning for the identification of respiratory viral attachment machinery from sequences data.PloS one · 2023Article
- Integrative Analysis of Next-Generation Sequencing for Next-Generation Cancer Research toward Artificial Intelligence.Cancers · 2021Review
- PFP-WGAN: Protein function prediction by discovering Gene Ontology term correlations with generative adversarial networks.PloS one · 2021Article
- Review
- NPF:network propagation for protein function prediction.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
- Metric learning on expression data for gene function prediction.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2020Article
- Hierarchical Microbial Functions Prediction by Graph Aggregated Embedding.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- NetGO: improving large-scale protein function prediction with massive network information.Nucleic acids research · 2019Article
- Towards region-specific propagation of protein functions.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2019Article
- Improving protein function prediction using protein sequence and GO-term similarities.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2019Article
- deepNF: deep network fusion for protein function prediction.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2018Article
- BUSCA: an integrative web server to predict subcellular localization of proteins.Nucleic acids research · 2018Article
- PANDA: Protein function prediction using domain architecture and affinity propagation.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Article
- Article
- Analysis of temporal transcription expression profiles reveal links between protein function and developmental stages of Drosophila melanogaster.PLoS computational biology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAccurate protein function annotation is a severe bottleneck when utilizing the deluge of high-throughput, next generation sequencing data. Keeping database annotations up-to-date has become a major scientific challenge that requires the development of reliable automatic predictors of protein function. The CAFA experiment provided a unique opportunity to undertake comprehensive 'blind testing' of many diverse approaches for automated function prediction. We report on the methodology we used for this challenge and on the lessons we learnt.
methodsOur method integrates into a single framework a wide variety of biological information sources, encompassing sequence, gene expression and protein-protein interaction data, as well as annotations in UniProt entries. The methodology transfers functional categories based on the results from complementary homology-based and feature-based analyses. We generated the final molecular function and biological process assignments by combining the initial predictions in a probabilistic manner, which takes into account the Gene Ontology hierarchical structure.
resultsWe propose a novel scoring function called COmbined Graph-Information Content similarity (COGIC) score for the comparison of predicted functional categories and benchmark data. We demonstrate that our integrative approach provides increased scope and accuracy over both the component methods and the naïve predictors. In line with previous studies, we find that molecular function predictions are more accurate than biological process assignments.
conclusionsOverall, the results indicate that there is considerable room for improvement in the field. It still remains for the community to invest a great deal of effort to make automated function prediction a useful and routine component in the toolbox of life scientists. As already witnessed in other areas, community-wide blind testing experiments will be pivotal in establishing standards for the evaluation of prediction accuracy, in fostering advancements and new ideas, and ultimately in recording progress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.