ReviewGenome biology2013
Studying the microbiology of the indoor environment.
Review in Genome biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
77 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review of the factors influencing microbial colonization of the preterm infant gut.Gut microbesPooled it
- Phytomycobiomes and Ecosystem Services: Mechanisms, Evidence and Routes to Application.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Touching Surfaces - Presence of microorganisms on antimicrobial metal surfaces on the International Space Station and in German schools.BMC microbiology · 2025Article
- Probiotic-Based Approaches for Sustainable Control of Infectious Risk in Mass Transport: Current Data and Future Perspectives.Microbial biotechnology · 2025Review
- Association between indoor ventilation frequency and low muscle mass among older adults in China: a national cross-sectional research.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Association between indoor ventilation frequency and frailty among Chinese older adults.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- A deployable film method to enable replicable sampling of low-abundance environmental microbiomes.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Challenges for pathologists in implementing clinical microbiome diagnostic testing.The journal of pathology. Clinical research · 2024Review
- Damp Buildings: Associated Fungi and How to Find Them.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Who inhabits the built environment? A microbiological point of view on the principal bacteria colonizing our urban areas.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Review
- Refining biome labeling for large-scale microbial community samples: Leveraging neural networks and transfer learning.Environmental science and ecotechnology · 2024Article
- Indoor Bacterial and Fungal Burden in "Moldy" versus "Non-Moldy" Homes: A Case Study Employing Advanced Sequencing Techniques in a US Metropolitan Area.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A comprehensive review of microbial contamination in the indoor environment: sources, sampling, health risks, and mitigation strategies.Frontiers in public health · 2023Review
- Bacterial viability in the built environment of the home.PloS one · 2023Article
- Review
- Clinically relevant pathogens on surfaces display differences in survival and transcriptomic response in relation to probiotic and traditional cleaning strategies.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2022Article
- Minority report: small-scale metagenomic analysis of the non-bacterial kitchen sponge microbiota.Archives of microbiology · 2022Article
- Environmental and Human Microbiome for Health.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Ability of Essential Oil Vapours to Reduce Numbers of Culturable Aerosolised Coronavirus, Bacteria and Fungi.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Resistomes and microbiome of meat trimmings and colon content from culled cows raised in conventional and organic production systems.Animal microbiome · 2022Article
17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The majority of people in the developed world spend more than 90% of their lives indoors. Here, we examine our understanding of the bacteria that co-inhabit our artificial world and how they might influence human health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.