Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23512869›Full record

ArticleResearch in nursing & health2013

Using a mobile application to self-monitor diet and fluid intake among adults receiving hemodialysis.

Janet L Welch, Kim Schafer Astroth, Susan M Perkins, Cynthia S Johnson, Kay Connelly, Katie A Siek, Josette Jones, Linda LaRue Scott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research in nursing & health, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. eHealth interventions for people with chronic kidney disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Janet L WelchIndiana University School of Nursing, 1111 Middle Drive, NU E403, Indianapolis, IN, USA. jwelch@iupui.edu
Kim Schafer Astroth
Susan M Perkins
Cynthia S Johnson
Kay Connelly
Katie A Siek
Josette Jones
Linda LaRue Scott

Funding

INDIANA UNIVERSITY: TRAINING IN BEHAVIORAL NURSINGT32NR007066 · NINR · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI RAWL, SUSAN M · 1990 to 2017
$4.2M
Self Monitoring of Dietary and Fluid Intake Using a PDAR21EB007083 · NIBIB · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI WELCH, JANET L · 2006 to 2007
$410k
NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB007083NIBIB NIH HHS R21EB007083NINR NIH HHS T32 NR007066
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hemodialysis patients have difficulty self-managing a complex dietary and fluid regimen. The purpose of this feasibility study was to pilot test an electronic self-monitoring intervention based on social cognitive theory. During a 6-week intervention, 24 participants self-monitored diet and fluid intake using the Dietary Intake Monitoring Application (DIMA), and 20 participants served as controls by monitoring their activity using the Daily Activity Monitor Application (DAMA). Results from this pilot study suggest the intervention is feasible and acceptable, although few significant effects on outcomes were found in this small sample. The DIMA has potential to facilitate dietary and fluid self-monitoring but requires additional refinement and further testing.

Indexed as

Computers, HandheldDietDrinkingRenal DialysisAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDiet RecordsFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient CompliancePilot ProjectsProgram Development

Identifiers

PMID23512869
PMCPMC3729274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.