Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23512830›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

A question of trust: user-centered design requirements for an informatics intervention to promote the sexual health of African-American youth.

Tiffany C Veinot, Terrance R Campbell, Daniel J Kruger, Alison Grodzinski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Applying anti-racist approaches to informatics: a new lens on traditional frames.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Lessons Learned in Centering Youth Voices in HIV Prevention: The Adolescent Health Working Group.Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Guidance for publishing qualitative research in informatics.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tiffany C VeinotSchool of Information, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1285, USA. tveinot@umich.edu
Terrance R Campbell
Daniel J Kruger
Alison Grodzinski

Funding

MICHIGAN INSTITUTE FOR CLINICAL AND HEALTH RESEARCH (MICHR) (UL1): (BPCA)UL1RR024986 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SHANLEY, THOMAS P. · 2007 to 2011
$51.2M
PREVENTION RESEARCH CENTER OF MICHIGANU48DP001901 · DP · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ZIMMERMAN, MARC A · 2009 to 2013
$5.9M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS 1-U48-DP-001901NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP001901NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP006397NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024986NCRR NIH HHS UL1RR024986
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe investigated the user requirements of African-American youth (aged 14-24 years) to inform the design of a culturally appropriate, network-based informatics intervention for the prevention of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections (STI). MATERIALS AND

methodsWe conducted 10 focus groups with 75 African-American youth from a city with high HIV/STI prevalence. Data analyses involved coding using qualitative content analysis procedures and memo writing.

resultsUnexpectedly, the majority of participants' design recommendations concerned trust. Youth expressed distrust towards people and groups, which was amplified within the context of information technology-mediated interactions about HIV/STI. Participants expressed distrust in the reliability of condoms and the accuracy of HIV tests. They questioned the benevolence of many institutions, and some rejected authoritative HIV/STI information. Therefore, reputational information, including rumor, influenced HIV/STI-related decision making. Participants' design requirements also focused on trust-related concerns. Accordingly, we developed a novel trust-centered design framework to guide intervention design. DISCUSSION: Current approaches to online trust for health informatics do not consider group-level trusting patterns. Yet, trust was the central intervention-relevant issue among African-American youth, suggesting an important focus for culturally informed design. Our design framework incorporates: intervention objectives (eg, network embeddedness, participation); functional specifications (eg, decision support, collective action, credible question and answer services); and interaction design (eg, member control, offline network linkages, optional anonymity).

conclusionsTrust is a critical focus for HIV/STI informatics interventions for young African Americans. Our design framework offers practical, culturally relevant, and systematic guidance to designers to reach this underserved group better.

Indexed as

Black or African AmericanConsumer Health InformationTrustAdolescentFemaleFocus GroupsHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMedical InformaticsReproductive HealthSexually Transmitted DiseasesYoung AdultAfrican AmericansConsumer health informaticsculturally informed designHIV/STI preventionsocial networksyouth

Identifiers

PMID23512830
PMCPMC3721161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.