Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23512445›Full record

Trial reportObesity surgery2013

Swallowable Obalon® gastric balloons as an aid for weight loss: a pilot feasibility study.

François Mion, Mostafa Ibrahim, Sophie Marjoux, Thierry Ponchon, Sonia Dugardeyn, Sabine Roman, Jacques Deviere

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Obesity surgery, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Endoscopic bariatrics: Current status and emerging technologies.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Endoscopic Bariatric Therapy for Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome.The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2023
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Overview on the endoscopic treatment for obesity: A review.World journal of gastroenterology · 2023
    Review
  8. Metabolic and Bariatric Endoscopy: A Mini-Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Primary Bariatric Procedures.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2022
    Review
  12. Six intragastric balloons: Which to choose?World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Intra-gastric balloons - The past, present and future.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

François MionDepartment of Digestive Diseases, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital E. Herriot, Lyon, France. francois.mion@chu-lyon.fr
Mostafa Ibrahim
Sophie Marjoux
Thierry Ponchon
Sonia Dugardeyn
Sabine Roman
Jacques Deviere

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of this study was to evaluate the safety and the impact on weight loss of a new swallowable gastric balloon. In this prospective pilot study, 17 overweight or obese patients were included. Up to three balloons were ingested under fluoroscopic control. All balloons were removed by upper GI endoscopy, 12 weeks after the ingestion of the first balloon. 43 out of 44 attempts (98 %) to swallow a balloon were successful. Nausea and stomach pain were the most frequent side effects. Endoscopic procedures for balloon removal were uneventful. Weight loss was significant at weeks 4, 8, and 12. This pilot study showed no significant side effects induced by up to three balloons, and a significant weight loss.

Indexed as

DeglutitionGastric BalloonAbdominal PainAdministration, OralAdultBody Mass IndexDevice RemovalFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNauseaObesity, MorbidPilot ProjectsProspective Studies

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.