ArticleThe protein journal2013
Automated protein subcellular localization based on local invariant features.
Article in The protein journal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To understand the function of the encoded proteins, we need to be able to know the subcellular location of a protein. The most common method used for determining subcellular location is fluorescence microscopy which allows subcellular localizations to be imaged in high throughput. Image feature calculation has proven invaluable in the automated analysis of cellular images. This article proposes a novel method named LDPs for feature extraction based on invariant of translation and rotation from given images, the nature which is to count the local difference features of images, and the difference features are given by calculating the D-value between the gray value of the central pixel c and the gray values of eight pixels in the neighborhood. The novel method is tested on two image sets, the first set is which fluorescently tagged protein was endogenously expressed in 10 sebcellular locations, and the second set is which protein was transfected in 11 locations. A SVM was trained and tested for each image set and classification accuracies of 96.7 and 92.3 % were obtained on the endogenous and transfected sets respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23512411What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.