Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23512379›Full record

ReviewActa neuropathologica2013

What do we know about IDH1/2 mutations so far, and how do we use it?

Craig Horbinski

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta neuropathologica, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 112 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
112citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

112 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Noninvasive Determination ofAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. TNMR in biomedicine · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Preparation and Preclinical Evaluation ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  18. Reply.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2024
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

52 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Craig HorbinskiDepartment of Pathology, University of Kentucky, 307 Combs Cancer Research Facility, 800 Rose Street, Lexington, KY 40536, USA. craig.horbinski@uky.edu

Funding

UNDERSTANDING THE MOLECULAR BASIS OF EPIGENETIC TRANSCRIPTIONAL SILENCINGP20RR020171 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI WHITEHEART, SIDNEY WALDO · 2004 to 2011
$16.5M
The Significance of Isocitrate Dehydrogenase Mutations in GliomasK08CA155764 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI HORBINSKI, CRAIG MICHAEL · 2011 to 2015
$857k
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA155764NCI NIH HHS K08 CA155764-01A1NCRR NIH HHS 2P20 RR020171NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR020171
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whole genome analyses have facilitated the discovery of clinically relevant genetic alterations in a variety of diseases, most notably cancer. A prominent example of this was the discovery of mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenases 1 and 2 (IDH1/2) in a sizeable proportion of gliomas and some other neoplasms. Herein the normal functions of these enzymes, how the mutations alter their catalytic properties, the effects of their D-2-hydroxyglutarate metabolite, technical considerations in diagnostic neuropathology, implications about prognosis and therapeutic considerations, and practical applications and controversies regarding IDH1/2 mutation testing are discussed.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGliomaHumansIsocitrate DehydrogenaseMutationPrognosisIDH1 protein, humanIDH2 protein, humanIsocitrate Dehydrogenase

Identifiers

PMID23512379
PMCPMC3633675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.