Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23512293›Full record

SynthesisChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2013

Lack of uniformity in the clinical assessment of children with lipomyelomeningocele: a review of the literature and recommendations for the future.

Lindy May, Richard Hayward, Aabir Chakraborty, Linda Franck, Grazia Manzotti, Jo Wray, Dominic Thompson

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Symptomatic retethering of the spinal cord in postoperative lipomyelomeningocele patients: a meta-analysis.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2016
    Pooled it
  2. Neurosurgical management of conus lipoma in Canada: a multi-center survey.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2020
    Article
  3. Review
  4. A Novel Occulta-Type Spina Bifida Mediated by Murine Double HeterozygotesFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2017
    Article
  5. Article
  6. The natural history and management of patients with congenital deficits associated with lumbosacral lipomas.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2016
    Article
  7. A practical clinical classification of spinal neural tube defects.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lindy MayDepartment of Paediatric Neurosurgery, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, NHS Foundation Trust, Great Ormond Street, London, UK. Lindy.May@gosh.nhs.uk
Richard Hayward
Aabir Chakraborty
Linda Franck
Grazia Manzotti
Jo Wray
Dominic Thompson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAn objective clinical assessment tool whose accuracy and reproducibility can be validated is essential for the initial evaluation, selection for surgery and surveillance of children with lipomyelomeningocele (LMMC). The aim of this study was to analyse the large number of such tools presently in use and recommend an alternative that could lead to greater uniformity between different series and greater consistency in the assessment of individual patients.

methodsA systematic review of the literature between January 1980 and December 2010 was undertaken and details of how the children in each series were assessed and the degree to which age was taken into account recorded.

resultsThirty-six different assessment tools were used in 40 different publications. None was validated in all aspects. Objective measures were used most in urological assessments but rarely in other domains. Age-specific assessments were used in only 10 % of publications.

conclusionThis study confirmed that the assessment tools for evaluation of children with LMMC are inconsistent, often vague and poorly validated. This compromises the ability of clinicians who care for them to compare studies across centres for both treated and untreated children. We have sought to highlight those criteria which are relevant, measurable and reproducible and which might be combined into an easily applied assessment.

Indexed as

Outcome Assessment, Health CareDatabases, FactualHumansMeningomyeloceleRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.