ArticleWorld journal of urology2013
Landscape of chromosome number changes in prostate cancer progression.
Article in World journal of urology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic significance of phospho-histone H3 in prostate carcinoma.World journal of urology · 2014Trial
- The Utility of Phosphohistone H3 in Inter-Observer Variability of Mitotic Count in Meningioma, is There Any Benefit?Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2021Article
- Review
- Systematic Elucidation of the Aneuploidy Landscape and Identification of Aneuploidy Driver Genes in Prostate Cancer.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Article
- The emerging links between chromosomal instability (CIN), metastasis, inflammation and tumour immunity.Molecular cytogenetics · 2019Review
- Better see to better agree: phosphohistone H3 increases interobserver agreement in mitotic count for meningioma grading and imposes new specific thresholds.Neuro-oncology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeBoth genetic instability resulting in aneuploidy and increased proliferative activity are common features of tumor development and progression. Cytometric evaluation of tumor ploidy status was recently suggested as a prognostic marker. However, in prostate cancer (PCa), a chromosome-specific evaluation is lacking. With the present study, we sought to identify distinct chromosomal changes to complement cytometric results concerning the diagnosis and prognosis of PCa patients.
methodsWe assessed a cohort of 428 PCa specimens (186 localized PCa, 75 lymph node metastasized PCa, 125 lymph node metastases, 42 hormone-refractory distant metastases) for numerical alterations of all 24 chromosomes by using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Conducting immunohistochemistry with phosphorylated histone H3 (PHH3) and Ki-67, we quantified the proliferation rate. FISH results were fit in a linear model and tested for predictive power.
resultsAs expected, we observed a significant increase in aneuploidy with advancing tumor stage. Similarly, an increased expression of the mitotic marker PHH3 was significantly associated with aneuploidy and higher pT-stage. We found aneusomy of chromosomes 4, 6, 20, and X to be indicative of lymph node metastasized PCa. However, with an AUC of 65%, this set of chromosomal changes was poorly suited to distinguish non-metastasized and lymph node metastasized primary tumors.
conclusionOur results provide thorough insight into the so far incompletely elucidated chromosomal landscape of PCa. While overall ploidy status and PHH3 expression in primary tumors indicate advanced disease, a FISH-based test for distinct alterations does not seem to be beneficial for diagnostic or prognostic decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.