Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23511565›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2013

A retrospective observational study of the relationship between family history and survival from colorectal cancer.

E J A Morris, S Penegar, L E Whitehouse, P Quirke, P Finan, D T Bishop, J Wilkinson, R S Houlston

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Risk of Second Cancer in Hodgkin Lymphoma Survivors and Influence of Family History.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Familial colorectal cancer screening: When and what to do?World journal of gastroenterology · 2015
    Review
  14. Observational
  15. Family history of colorectal cancer is not associated with colorectal cancer survival regardless of microsatellite instability status.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2014
    Article
  16. Familial colorectal cancer: a review.World journal of gastroenterology · 2014
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

E J A MorrisColorectal Cancer Epidemiology Group, Section of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Leeds Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK. eva.morris@nycris.leedsth.nhs.uk
S Penegar
L E Whitehouse
P Quirke
P Finan
D T Bishop
J Wilkinson
R S Houlston
St James's University Hospital · GBUniversity of Leeds · GBInstitute of Cancer Research · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 10589Cancer Research UK 9805
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough family history is well established to be a risk factor for developing colorectal cancer (CRC), much less is known about its impact on patient survival. This study aimed to link CRC patient data from the National Study of Colorectal Cancer Genetics (NSCCG) to the National Cancer Data Repository (NCDR) to examine the relationship between family history and the characteristics and outcomes of CRC.

methodsAll eligible NSCCG patients underwent a matching process to the NCDR using combinations of their personal identifiers. The characteristics and survival of CRC patients with and without a family history of CRC were compared.

resultsOf the 10 937 NSCCG patients eligible to be matched into the NCDR, 10 782 (98.6%) could be fully linked. There were no significant differences between those with and without a family history of CRC (defined as having at least one affected first-degree relative) in terms of age, sex, tumour stage at diagnosis, presence of multiple cancers, mode of presentation to hospital and surgical management, although patients with familial CRC were more likely to have right-sided tumours (P<0.01). The survival of patients with familial CRC was significantly better than those with sporadic CRC (HR 0.89, 95%CI: 0.81-0.98, P=0.02).

conclusionWe have demonstrated that it is possible to robustly match patients recruited into the NSCCG into the NCDR and, by using this record linkage, enable genetic data to be related to CRC phenotype, clinical management and outcome. This study provides evidence that a family history of CRC is associated with better survival after a diagnosis of CRC.

Indexed as

AgedColorectal NeoplasmsFamily HealthFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSurvival AnalysisUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID23511565
PMCPMC3629434
OpenAlexW2024458394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.