Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23511345›Full record

Trial reportResearch in developmental disabilities2013

Validity and reliability of the Behavior Problems Inventory, the Aberrant Behavior Checklist, and the Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised among infants and toddlers at risk for intellectual or developmental disabilities: a multi-method assessment approach.

Johannes Rojahn, Stephen R Schroeder, Liliana Mayo-Ortega, Rosao Oyama-Ganiko, Judith LeBlanc, Janet Marquis, Elizabeth Berke

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical TrialValidation Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Research in developmental disabilities, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Johannes RojahnDepartment of Psychology, George Mason University, 10340 Democracy Lane, Suite 202, Fairfax, VA 22033, USA. jrojahn@gmu.edu
Stephen R Schroeder
Liliana Mayo-Ortega
Rosao Oyama-Ganiko
Judith LeBlanc
Janet Marquis
Elizabeth Berke
University of Kansas · USGeorge Mason University · US

Funding

Research Design and Analysis Core (RDAC)P30HD002528 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI DURHAM, DIANNE NONE · 1985 to 2015
$22.1M
Early Prevention of Aberrant Behavior in Neurodevelopmental Disorders in PeruR21HD060500 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI SCHROEDER, STEPHEN ROBERT · 2010 to 2011
$261k
NICHD NIH HHS HD 060500NICHD NIH HHS P30 HD002528NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD060500
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reliable and valid assessment of aberrant behaviors is essential in empirically verifying prevention and intervention for individuals with intellectual or developmental disabilities (IDD). Few instruments exist which assess behavior problems in infants. The current longitudinal study examined the performance of three behavior-rating scales for individuals with IDD that have been proven psychometrically sound in older populations: the Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC), the Behavior Problems Inventory (BPI-01), and the Repetitive Behavior Scale - Revised (RBS-R). Data were analyzed for 180 between six and 36 months old children at risk for IDD. Internal consistency (Cronbach's α) across the subscales of the three instruments was variable. Test-retest reliability of the three BPI-01 subscales ranged from .68 to .77 for frequency ratings and from .65 to .80 for severity ratings (intraclass correlation coefficients). Using a multitrait-multimethod matrix approach high levels of convergent and discriminant validity across the three instruments was found. As anticipated, there was considerable overlap in the information produced by the three instruments; however, each behavior-rating instrument also contributed unique information. Our findings support using all three scales in conjunction if possible.

Indexed as

Stereotyped BehaviorAggressionChecklistChild BehaviorChild, PreschoolDevelopmental DisabilitiesFemaleHumansInfantInfant BehaviorIntellectual DisabilityMalePersonality InventoryReproducibility of ResultsRisk FactorsSelf-Injurious Behavior

Identifiers

PMID23511345
PMCPMC3875135
OpenAlexW2123613077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.