Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23511300›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2013

Is it time to replace vancomycin in the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections?

Sebastiaan J van Hal, Vance G Fowler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Molecular Confirmation of Vancomycin-ResistantInternational journal of microbiology · 2021
    Article
  10. A comparison of daptomycin alone and in combination with ceftaroline fosamil for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia complicated by septic pulmonary emboli.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Mouse model of hematogenous implant-relatedProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sebastiaan J van HalDepartment of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Sydney, Australia. sebastian.vanhal@sswahs.nsw.gov.au
Vance G Fowler

Funding

Host Susceptibility to S. aureusR01AI068804 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI FOWLER, VANCE G. · 2007 to 2016
$6.9M
Mentoring Patient Oriented Research in Antibiotic-Resistant BacteriaK24AI093969 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI FOWLER, VANCE G. · 2011 to 2020
$1.6M
NIAID NIH HHS K24 AI093969NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI068804
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For more than 4 decades, vancomycin has been the antibiotic of choice for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections. Recently, infections due to isolates with high but susceptible vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations have been associated with additional treatment failures and patient mortality. These poorer outcomes may in part be explained by the inability of attaining appropriate vancomycin levels in these patients. However, assumptions that these poor outcomes are solely due to failure to achieve optimal serum levels of vancomycin are premature. The availability of effective alternatives further erodes the position of vancomycin as first-line therapy. The emergence of resistance and cost considerations, however, favor a more measured approach when using alternative antimicrobials. Collectively, the current available data suggest that the optimal therapy for MRSA infections remains unclear. In the absence of further data, the Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines remain relevant and inform clinicians of best practice for treating patients with MRSA infections.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsHumansMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMicrobial Sensitivity TestsStaphylococcal InfectionsTreatment OutcomeVancomycinVancomycin ResistanceAnti-Bacterial AgentsVancomycinAUC/MIC targetsminimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)MRSA, hVISA, VISAStaphylococcus aureusvancomycin

Identifiers

PMID23511300
PMCPMC3658366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.