Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23510761›Full record

ArticleExperimental neurology2013

Three-dimensional evaluation of retinal ganglion cell axon regeneration and pathfinding in whole mouse tissue after injury.

Xueting Luo, Yadira Salgueiro, Samuel R Beckerman, Vance P Lemmon, Pantelis Tsoulfas, Kevin K Park

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental neurology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 96 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
96citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

96 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 152 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Roles of Kdm6a and Kdm6b in Regulation of Mammalian Neural Regeneration.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Frontiers in ophthalmology · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Axon guidance in regeneration of the mature central.Neural regeneration research · 2023
    Article

36 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xueting LuoMiami Project to Cure Paralysis, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA. Xluo@med.miami.edu
Yadira Salgueiro
Samuel R Beckerman
Vance P Lemmon
Pantelis Tsoulfas
Kevin K Park
University of Miami · US

Funding

Regeneration and Reconnection of Damaged Optic NerveR01EY022961 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI PARK, KEVIN KYUNG · 2013 to 2019
$2.1M
NEI NIH HHS 1R01EY022961-01NEI NIH HHS R01 EY022961NICHD NIH HHS HD057521
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Injured retinal ganglion cell (RGC) axons do not regenerate spontaneously, causing loss of vision in glaucoma and after trauma. Recent studies have identified several strategies that induce long distance regeneration in the optic nerve. Thus, a pressing question now is whether regenerating RGC axons can find their appropriate targets. Traditional methods of assessing RGC axon regeneration use histological sectioning. However, tissue sections provide fragmentary information about axonal trajectory and termination. To unequivocally evaluate regenerating RGC axons, here we apply tissue clearance and light sheet fluorescence microscopy (LSFM) to image whole optic nerve and brain without physical sectioning. In mice with PTEN/SOCS3 deletion, a condition known to promote robust regeneration, axon growth followed tortuous paths through the optic nerve, with many axons reversing course and extending towards the eye. Such aberrant growth was prevalent in the proximal region of the optic nerve where strong astroglial activation is present. In the optic chiasms of PTEN/SOCS3 deletion mice and PTEN deletion/Zymosan/cAMP mice, many axons project to the opposite optic nerve or to the ipsilateral optic tract. Following bilateral optic nerve crush, similar divergent trajectory is seen at the optic chiasm compared to unilateral crush. Centrally, axonal projection is limited predominantly to the hypothalamus. Together, we demonstrate the applicability of LSFM for comprehensive assessment of optic nerve regeneration, providing in-depth analysis of the axonal trajectory and pathfinding. Our study indicates significant axon misguidance in the optic nerve and brain, and underscores the need for investigation of axon guidance mechanisms during optic nerve regeneration in adults.

Indexed as

Imaging, Three-DimensionalAdenoviridaeAnimalsAxonsCholera ToxinCyclic AMPDisease Models, AnimalFemaleFunctional LateralityGreen Fluorescent ProteinsMiceMice, TransgenicMicroscopy, FluorescenceNerve CrushNerve RegenerationOptic Nerve DiseasesCholera ToxinCyclic AMPenhanced green fluorescent proteinGreen Fluorescent ProteinsPTEN PhosphohydrolasePten protein, mouseSocs3 protein, mouseSuppressor of Cytokine Signaling 3 ProteinSuppressor of Cytokine Signaling ProteinsZymosanAxon growthAxon regenerationAxotomyPTENRetinal ganglion cellSOCS3

Identifiers

PMID23510761
PMCPMC3726550
OpenAlexW1981053922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.