Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23510511›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Chemical Society2013

Quantifying functional group interactions that determine urea effects on nucleic acid helix formation.

Emily J Guinn, Jeffrey J Schwinefus, Hyo Keun Cha, Joseph L McDevitt, Wolf E Merker, Ryan Ritzer, Gregory W Muth, Samuel W Engelsgjerd, Kathryn E Mangold, Perry J Thompson and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Crowding beyond excluded volume: A tale of two dimers.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Urea-aromatic interactions in biology.Biophysical reviews · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Emily J GuinnDepartment of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA.
Jeffrey J Schwinefus
Hyo Keun Cha
Joseph L McDevitt
Wolf E Merker
Ryan Ritzer
Gregory W Muth
Samuel W Engelsgjerd
Kathryn E Mangold
Perry J Thompson
Michael J Kerins
M Thomas Record
St. Olaf College · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

THERMODYNAMIC AND NMR STUDIES ON THE E COLI CYTOPLASMR01GM047022 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI RECORD, M. THOMAS · 1992 to 2015
$4.1M
DNA and RNA Stability in Glycine Betaine, TMAO, and Urea Solutions: Correlating SR15GM093331 · NIGMS · ST. OLAF COLLEGE · PI MUTH, GREGORY W, SCHWINEFUS, JEFFREY JAMES · 2010 to 2010
$196k
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS GM 47022NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM047022NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM093331NIGMS NIH HHS R15-GM093331
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urea destabilizes helical and folded conformations of nucleic acids and proteins, as well as protein-nucleic acid complexes. To understand these effects, extend previous characterizations of interactions of urea with protein functional groups, and thereby develop urea as a probe of conformational changes in protein and nucleic acid processes, we obtain chemical potential derivatives (μ23 = dμ2/dm3) quantifying interactions of urea (component 3) with nucleic acid bases, base analogues, nucleosides, and nucleotide monophosphates (component 2) using osmometry and hexanol-water distribution assays. Dissection of these μ23 values yields interaction potentials quantifying interactions of urea with unit surface areas of nucleic acid functional groups (heterocyclic aromatic ring, ring methyl, carbonyl and phosphate O, amino N, sugar (C and O); urea interacts favorably with all these groups, relative to interactions with water. Interactions of urea with heterocyclic aromatic rings and attached methyl groups (as on thymine) are particularly favorable, as previously observed for urea-homocyclic aromatic ring interactions. Urea m-values determined for double helix formation by DNA dodecamers near 25 °C are in the range of 0.72-0.85 kcal mol(-1)m(-1) and exhibit little systematic dependence on nucleobase composition (17-42% GC). Interpretation of these results using the urea interaction potentials indicates that extensive (60-90%) stacking of nucleobases in the separated strands in the transition region is required to explain the m-value. Results for RNA and DNA dodecamers obtained at higher temperatures, and literature data, are consistent with this conclusion. This demonstrates the utility of urea as a quantitative probe of changes in surface area (ΔASA) in nucleic acid processes.

Indexed as

Base SequenceDNAModels, MolecularNucleic Acid ConformationNucleic Acid DenaturationRNAThermodynamicsTransition TemperatureUreaVolatilizationDNARNAUrea

Identifiers

PMID23510511
PMCPMC3655208
OpenAlexW2066600089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.