Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23510414›Full record

ReviewTissue antigens2013

Dissecting graft-versus-leukemia from graft-versus-host-disease using novel strategies.

E H Warren, H J Deeg

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Tissue antigens, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Graft CD8International journal of hematology · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Early Mixed Lymphoid Donor/Host Chimerism is Associated with Improved Transplant Outcome in Patients with Primary or Secondary Myelofibrosis.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The Graft-Versus-Leukemia Effect in AML.Frontiers in oncology · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Donor Allospecific CD44Frontiers in immunology · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

E H WarrenClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98109-1024, USA. ehwarren@u.washington.edu
H J Deeg

Funding

TRANSPLANTATION IMMUNOLOGYP01AI033484 · NIAID · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI HANSEN, JOHN ANDREW · 1992 to 2013
$13.1M
Whole Genome Association Analysis of Hematopoietic Cell Transplant (HCT) OutcomeR01HL105914 · NHLBI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI MARTIN, PAUL J · 2011 to 2019
$9.8M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL105914NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL105914NIAID NIH HHS AI033484NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI033484
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The intrinsic anti-leukemic effect of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is dependent on genetic disparity between donor and recipient, intimately associated with graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and mediated by lymphocytes contained in or derived from the donor hematopoietic cell graft. Three decades of intense effort have not identified clinical strategies that can reliably separate the graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect from the alloimmune reaction that drives clinical GVHD. For patients who require HCT and for whom two or more human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A, -B, -C, and -DRB1-matched donor candidates can be identified, consideration of donor and recipient genotype at additional genetic loci both within and outside the major histocompatibility complex may offer the possibility of selecting the donor [candidate(s)] that poses the lowest probability of GVHD and the highest probability of a potent GVL effect. Strategies for engineering conventional donor lymphocyte infusion also hold promise for prevention or improved treatment of post-transplant relapse. The brightest prospects for selectively enhancing the anti-leukemic efficacy of allogeneic HCT, however, are likely to be interventions that are designed to enhance specific antitumor immunity via vaccination or adoptive cell transfer, rather than those that attempt to exploit donor alloreactivity against the host. Adoptive transfer of donor-derived T cells genetically modified for tumor-specific reactivity, in particular, has the potential to transform the practice of allogeneic HCT by selectively enhancing antitumor immunity without causing GVHD.

Indexed as

Graft vs Leukemia EffectHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationImmunotherapy, AdoptiveChromosome MappingGenetic LociGraft vs Host DiseaseHistocompatibilityHLA AntigensHumansLeukemiaTissue DonorsT-LymphocytesTransplantation, HomologousHLA Antigens

Identifiers

PMID23510414
PMCPMC3645301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.