Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23509706›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2013

Evaluation of the toxicity of Pradosia huberi extract during the preimplantation in Wistar rats.

Aldeíde de Oliveira Batista Rocha, Liliane de Queirós Sousa, Clélia de Alencar Xavier Mota, Elane Cristina S Santos, Margareth de Fátima Formiga Melo Diniz, Marcelo Sobral da Silva, Martina Bragante F Pimenta, Rita de Cássia da Silveira e Sá

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Assessment of Pradosia huberi effects on the reproductive system of male rats.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Aldeíde de Oliveira Batista RochaBiotechnology Center, Federal University of Paraíba, P.O. Box 5009, 58051-970 João Pessoa, PB, Brazil. aldeiderocha@hotmail.com
Liliane de Queirós Sousa
Clélia de Alencar Xavier Mota
Elane Cristina S Santos
Margareth de Fátima Formiga Melo Diniz
Marcelo Sobral da Silva
Martina Bragante F Pimenta
Rita de Cássia da Silveira e Sá

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The treatment during the embryonic preimplantation phase of Wistar rats with the Pradosia huberi extract did not interfere with the water and feed consumption, as well as upon the body-weight gain. However, it has expressed a decrease of the uterine implant number, followed by the preimplantation losses at all applied doses (1.22, 6.1, and 30.5 mg/kg), and the number of embryonic resorptions in the two highest doses (6.1 and 30.5 mg/kg). After the organ weighing (hypophysis, ovaries, and uterus), only the relative weight of the hypophysis was raised at the different doses (1.22, 6.1, and 30.5 mg/kg). It was concluded that the hydroalcoholic extract of Pradosia huberi compromises the reproductive ability during the embryonic preimplantation phase, suggesting a possible toxic effect upon the reproductive system of Wistar rats.

Indexed as

AnimalsBehavior, AnimalBlastocystBody WeightFeeding BehaviorFemaleMaleMaternal ExposurePlant ExtractsPregnancyPregnancy, AnimalRatsRats, WistarReproductionSapotaceaePlant Extracts

Identifiers

PMID23509706
PMCPMC3591233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.