Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23508596›Full record

ArticleAnnals of family medicine

Long-term psychosocial consequences of false-positive screening mammography.

John Brodersen, Volkert Dirk Siersma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of family medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 155 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
155citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

155 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Screening for reducing morbidity and mortality in malignant melanoma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Screening for breast cancer with mammography.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. AI for screening in healthcare: promise and challenges.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Psychosocial impact of false-positive surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

95 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

John BrodersenResearch Unit and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. john.brodersen@sund.ku.dk
Volkert Dirk Siersma

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCancer screening programs have the potential of intended beneficial effects, but they also inevitably have unintended harmful effects. In the case of screening mammography, the most frequent harm is a false-positive result. Prior efforts to measure their psychosocial consequences have been limited by short-term follow-up, the use of generic survey instruments, and the lack of a relevant benchmark-women with breast cancer.

methodsIn this cohort study with a 3-year follow-up, we recruited 454 women with abnormal findings in screening mammography over a 1-year period. For each woman with an abnormal finding on a screening mammogram (false and true positives), we recruited another 2 women with normal screening results who were screened the same day at the same clinic. These participants were asked to complete the Consequences of Screening in Breast Cancer-a validated questionnaire encompassing 12 psychosocial outcomes-at baseline, 1, 6, 18, and 36 months.

resultsSix months after final diagnosis, women with false-positive findings reported changes in existential values and inner calmness as great as those reported by women with a diagnosis of breast cancer (Δ = 1.15; P = .015; and Δ = 0.13; P = .423, respectively). Three years after being declared free of cancer, women with false-positive results consistently reported greater negative psychosocial consequences compared with women who had normal findings in all 12 psychosocial outcomes (Δ >0 for 12 of 12 outcomes; P <.01 for 4 of 12 outcomes).

conclusionFalse-positive findings on screening mammography causes long-term psychosocial harm: 3 years after a false-positive finding, women experience psychosocial consequences that range between those experienced by women with a normal mammogram and those with a diagnosis of breast cancer.

Indexed as

False Positive ReactionsAgedAnxietyBreast NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesDenmarkFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMammographyMass ScreeningMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID23508596
PMCPMC3601385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.