Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23507900›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Rheumatology2013

Management of cancer treatment-induced bone loss.

Robert E Coleman, Emma Rathbone, Janet E Brown

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Rheumatology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Activation of the noncanonical inflammasome-GSDMD pathway triggers pyroptosis in bone marrow and promotes periosteal bone formation.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Robert E ColemanAcademic Unit of Oncology, Sheffield Cancer Research Centre, Weston Park Hospital, Whitham Road, Sheffield S10 2SJ, UK. r.e.coleman@sheffield.ac.uk
Emma Rathbone
Janet E Brown
Weston Park Cancer Centre · GBCancer Research UK · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 10048
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The survival prospects for many patients with cancer are steadily improving. As a result, survivorship issues are of increasing importance as attempts are made to minimize the long-term adverse effects of cancer treatments. Cancer therapies can adversely affect bone health, particularly in women with breast cancer and men with prostate cancer. Strategies for screening patients at increased risk for fragility fracture, and treatment algorithms using both bone-targeted treatments and other therapeutic interventions, are being developed. Both bisphosphonates and denosumab have been evaluated as treatments to prevent or reverse the bone loss associated with cancer treatments. Zoledronic acid is the most extensively assessed agent and has been shown to prevent bone loss in patients with breast cancer experiencing a premature menopause, in postmenopausal women receiving an aromatase inhibitor and in patients with prostate cancer undergoing androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). To date, the improvements in bone mineral density have not translated into a reduced fracture rate. However, in a large phase III trial, denosumab has been shown to reduce vertebral fractures in men receiving ADT for prostate cancer. These bone-targeted treatments have also been shown to modify the course of the underlying cancer and prevent metastasis, although the beneficial effects are confined to patients with low levels of circulating reproductive hormones.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBone Density Conservation AgentsBone ResorptionBreast NeoplasmsFemaleFractures, BoneHumansMaleProstatic NeoplasmsAntineoplastic AgentsBone Density Conservation Agents

Identifiers

PMID23507900
OpenAlexW2164492215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.