ArticleUrologic oncology2014
Do racial disparities exist in the use of prostate cancer screening and detection tools in veterans?
Article in Urologic oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening Patterns and Metastatic Prostate Cancer in US Veterans.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Understanding Racial Disparities in Prostate Cancer: A Multifaceted Approach.Cancer medicine · 2025Review
- Exploring prostate-specific antigen (PSA) Testing rates and screening disparities in the all of us dataset.Urologic oncology · 2025Article
- Survival Outcomes by Race and Ethnicity in Veterans With Nonmetastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.JAMA network open · 2023Observational
- Racial and Ethnic Variation in PSA Testing and Prostate Cancer Incidence Following the 2012 USPSTF Recommendation.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2021Article
- Prostate Cancer Disparities by Race and Ethnicity: From Nucleotide to Neighborhood.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2018Review
- Impact of race in a predominantly African-American population of patients with low/intermediate risk prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy within an equal access care institution.International urology and nephrology · 2014Article
- Racial disparities in cancer care in the Veterans Affairs health care system and the role of site of care.American journal of public health · 2014Article
- Recent publications by ochsner authors.Ochsner journal · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo determine whether racial disparities exist in the use of prostate cancer screening and detection tools in veterans. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Administrative data were obtained from the Corporate Data Warehouse on a national cohort of 275,831 veterans (21% African American [AA]) between the ages of 40 and 70 years who were free of heart disease, did not have an elevated prostate specific antigen (PSA) level (>4 ng/ml), did not have other clinical signs of prostate cancer, had not been diagnosed with prostate cancer, and had not received treatment for prostate cancer between January 10, 1998 and September 30, 2000. Subjects were followed up until September 30, 2007. Regular users were defined as those with at least 1 annual visit to the Veterans Healthcare Administration (VHA) between October 1, 1998 and September 30, 2000. We sought to determine if race was significantly associated with PSA testing, the time to elevated PSA detection, the time to prostate biopsy, and the time to diagnosis of prostate cancer. Chi-square tests, logistic regression, and Cox proportional hazard models were used to test for associations between race and prostate cancer variables.
resultsEighty-four percent of the veterans between the ages 40 and 70 years undergo PSA testing. AA veterans are as likely as white veterans to undergo PSA testing. Screened AA veterans are more likely to have a PSA>4 ng/ml, undergo prostate biopsy, and be diagnosed with prostate cancer than screened white veterans. The time intervals between undergoing a prostate biopsy and being diagnosed with prostate cancer were statistically significantly shorter (although unlikely of clinical significance) for AA veterans with a PSA level>4 ng/ml than that for white veterans with a PSA level>4 ng/ml. When routine care in regular VHA users was compared with that of participants in major screening trials such as Prostate, Lung, Ovarian and Colon Cancer Trial and European Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer, prostate biopsy rates were lower (30% vs. 40%-86%), prostate cancer detection rates/person biopsied were higher (49% vs. 31%-45%), and incidence of prostate cancer was 1.1% vs. 4.9% to 8.3%.
conclusionsAmong regular users of the VHA for healthcare, no disparities toward AA veterans exist in the use of prostate cancer screening and detection tools. Any differences in prostate cancer treatment outcomes are not likely because of inequalities in the use of prostate cancer screening or detection tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.