Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23506245›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society2014

The Stroke Hyperglycemia Insulin Network Effort (SHINE) trial protocol: a randomized, blinded, efficacy trial of standard vs. intensive hyperglycemia management in acute stroke.

Askiel Bruno, Valerie L Durkalski, Christiana E Hall, Rattan Juneja, William G Barsan, Scott Janis, William J Meurer, Amy Fansler, Karen C Johnston, SHINE investigators

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Poor venous outflow profiles increase the risk of reperfusion hemorrhage after endovascular treatment.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Askiel BrunoDepartment of Neurology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA, USA.
Valerie L Durkalski
Christiana E Hall
Rattan Juneja
William G Barsan
Scott Janis
William J Meurer
Amy Fansler
Karen C Johnston
SHINE investigators
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of Virginia · USAugusta University · USIndiana University School of MedicineMedical University of South Carolina · USNational Institutes of Health · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

Neurologic Emergencies Treatment Trials Network: Clinical Coordinating CenterU01NS056975 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BARSAN, WILLIAM G · 2006 to 2015
$40.4M
The Stroke Hyperglycemia Insulin Network Effort (SHINE) TrialU01NS069498 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI BRUNO, ASKIEL, HALL, CHRISTIANA · 2011 to 2017
$27.7M
Neurological Emergencies Treatment Trials Network Statistical and Data ManagementU01NS059041 · NINDS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI DURKALSKI, VALERIE L, PALESCH, YUKO Y · 2006 to 2015
$9.1M
NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS056975NINDS NIH HHS U01-NS056975NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS059041NINDS NIH HHS U01-NS059041NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS069498NINDS NIH HHS U01-NS069498
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationalePatients with acute ischemic stroke and hyperglycemia have worse outcomes than those without hyperglycemia. Intensive glucose control during acute stroke is feasible and can be accomplished safely but has not been fully assessed for efficacy.

aimsThe Stroke Hyperglycemia Insulin Network Effort trial aims to determine the safety and efficacy of standard vs. intensive glucose control with insulin in hyperglycemic acute ischemic stroke patients.

designThis is a randomized, blinded, multicenter, phase III trial of approximately 1400 hyperglycemic patients who receive either standard sliding scale subcutaneous insulin (blood glucose range 80-179 mg/dL, 4·44-9·93 mmol/L) or continuous intravenous insulin (target blood glucose 80-130 mg/dL, 4·44-7·21 mmol/L) for up to 72 h, starting within 12 h of stroke symptom onset. The acute treatment phase is single blind (for the patients), but the final outcome assessment is double blind. The study is powered to detect a 7% absolute difference in favorable outcome at 90 days. STUDY OUTCOMES: The primary outcome is a baseline severity adjusted 90-day modified Rankin Scale score, defined as 0, 0-1, or 0-2, if the baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score is 3-7, 8-14, or 15-22, respectively. The primary safety outcome is the rate of severe hypoglycemia (<40 mg/dL, <2·22 mmol/L). DISCUSSION: This trial will provide important novel information about preferred management of acute ischemic stroke patients with hyperglycemia. It will determine the potential benefits and risks of intensive glucose control during acute stroke.

Indexed as

AdultBlood GlucoseDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansHyperglycemiaHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinMaleMiddle AgedStrokeTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesYoung AdultBlood GlucoseHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinacute ischemic strokecerebral infarctionclinical trialhyperglycemiaprotocols

Identifiers

PMID23506245
PMCPMC3904437
OpenAlexW2018053057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.