ArticlePloS one2013
Global coordination and standardisation in marine biodiversity through the World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) and related databases.
Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
79 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Characteristics of Mitochondrial Genomes and Phylogenetic Analysis of Three Species of Littorinimorpha Snails.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Gaps and drivers of global marine animal biodiversity from the surface to abyss.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Analysis of the Structure and Functioning of the Chudao Oyster Reef Ecosystem in Sanggou Bay, China.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Amphipod species in European and nearby seas.Biodiversity data journal · 2026Article
- Benchmarking Cost-Effective DNA Extraction Kits for Diverse Metagenomic Samples.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Geopolitical impacts on the description of new terrestrial mollusc species.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
- Freshwater Foraminifera Biodiversity in New England (USA): Evaluation of Field Sites and a Botanical Garden.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Range maps and waterbody occupancy data for 1158 freshwater macroinvertebrate genera in the contiguous USA.Scientific data · 2024Article
- Low human interest for the most at-risk reef fishes worldwide.Science advances · 2024Article
- Systematic Distribution of Bioluminescence in Marine Animals: A Species-Level Inventory.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Marine protected areas promote stability of reef fish communities under climate warming.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Article
- rCRUX: A Rapid and Versatile Tool for Generating Metabarcoding Reference libraries in R.Environmental DNA (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2024Article
- The evolution of resource management in Taiwanese fisheries: coastal and offshore perspectives.PeerJ · 2024Article
- Exceptional endemicity of Aotearoa New Zealand biota shows how taxa dispersal traits, but not phylogeny, correlate with global species richness.Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand · 2024Article
- Global inventory of species categorized by known underwater sonifery.Scientific data · 2023Article
- Widespread support for a global species list with a formal governance system.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The World Register of Marine Species is an over 90% complete open-access inventory of all marine species names. Here we illustrate the scale of the problems with species names, synonyms, and their classification, and describe how WoRMS publishes online quality assured information on marine species. Within WoRMS, over 100 global, 12 regional and 4 thematic species databases are integrated with a common taxonomy. Over 240 editors from 133 institutions and 31 countries manage the content. To avoid duplication of effort, content is exchanged with 10 external databases. At present WoRMS contains 460,000 taxonomic names (from Kingdom to subspecies), 368,000 species level combinations of which 215,000 are currently accepted marine species names, and 26,000 related but non-marine species. Associated information includes 150,000 literature sources, 20,000 images, and locations of 44,000 specimens. Usage has grown linearly since its launch in 2007, with about 600,000 unique visitors to the website in 2011, and at least 90 organisations from 12 countries using WoRMS for their data management. By providing easy access to expert-validated content, WoRMS improves quality control in the use of species names, with consequent benefits to taxonomy, ecology, conservation and marine biodiversity research and management. The service manages information on species names that would otherwise be overly costly for individuals, and thus minimises errors in the application of nomenclature standards. WoRMS' content is expanding to include host-parasite relationships, additional literature sources, locations of specimens, images, distribution range, ecological, and biological data. Species are being categorised as introduced (alien, invasive), of conservation importance, and on other attributes. These developments have a multiplier effect on its potential as a resource for biodiversity research and management. As a consequence of WoRMS, we are witnessing improved communication within the scientific community, and anticipate increased taxonomic efficiency and quality control in marine biodiversity research and management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.