Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23505385›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2013

A role for the malignant brain tumour (MBT) domain protein LIN-61 in DNA double-strand break repair by homologous recombination.

Nicholas M Johnson, Bennie B L G Lemmens, Marcel Tijsterman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Mechanism of mitotic recombination: insights from C. elegans.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. NADNature communications · 2019
    Article
  8. ALG-2/AGO-DependentGenetics · 2019
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Repressive Chromatin inGenetics · 2018
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nicholas M JohnsonDepartment of Toxicogenetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Bennie B L G Lemmens
Marcel Tijsterman
Leiden University Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malignant brain tumour (MBT) domain proteins are transcriptional repressors that function within Polycomb complexes. Some MBT genes are tumour suppressors, but how they prevent tumourigenesis is unknown. The Caenorhabditis elegans MBT protein LIN-61 is a member of the synMuvB chromatin-remodelling proteins that control vulval development. Here we report a new role for LIN-61: it protects the genome by promoting homologous recombination (HR) for the repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). lin-61 mutants manifest numerous problems associated with defective HR in germ and somatic cells but remain proficient in meiotic recombination. They are hypersensitive to ionizing radiation and interstrand crosslinks but not UV light. Using a novel reporter system that monitors repair of a defined DSB in C. elegans somatic cells, we show that LIN-61 contributes to HR. The involvement of this MBT protein in HR raises the possibility that MBT-deficient tumours may also have defective DSB repair.

Indexed as

Caenorhabditis elegansCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsCell Transformation, NeoplasticChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneDNA RepairAnimalsChromatin Assembly and DisassemblyDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedGenomic InstabilityGerm CellsHomologous RecombinationHumansMutationRadiation, IonizingRadiation ToleranceUltraviolet RaysCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneLIN-61 protein, C elegans

Identifiers

PMID23505385
PMCPMC3591299
OpenAlexW2112639226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.