Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23504376›Full record

ArticleJournal of autism and developmental disorders2013

Comparison of ICD-10R, DSM-IV-TR and DSM-5 in an adult autism spectrum disorder diagnostic clinic.

C Ellie Wilson, Nicola Gillan, Deborah Spain, Dene Robertson, Gedeon Roberts, Clodagh M Murphy, Stefanos Maltezos, Janneke Zinkstok, Katie Johnston, Christina Dardani and 6 more

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Machine Learning Differentiation of Autism Spectrum Sub-Classifications.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Does sex influence the diagnostic evaluation of autism spectrum disorder in adults?Autism : the international journal of research and practice · 2016
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

C Ellie WilsonDepartment of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Science, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College, London, SE5 8AF, UK, ellie.wilson@kcl.ac.uk.
Nicola Gillan
Deborah Spain
Dene Robertson
Gedeon Roberts
Clodagh M Murphy
Stefanos Maltezos
Janneke Zinkstok
Katie Johnston
Christina Dardani
Chris Ohlsen
P Quinton Deeley
Michael Craig
Maria A Mendez
Francesca Happé
Declan G M Murphy

Funding

Department of Health CDRF-2012-03-059Department of Health RP-PG-0606-1045Medical Research Council G9817803
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) diagnosis is often used to access services. We investigated whether ASD diagnostic outcome varied when DSM-5 was used compared to ICD-10R and DSM-IV-TR in a clinical sample of 150 intellectually able adults. Of those diagnosed with an ASD using ICD-10R, 56 % met DSM-5 ASD criteria. A further 19 % met DSM-5 (draft) criteria for Social Communication Disorder. Of those diagnosed with Autistic Disorder/Asperger Syndrome on DSM-IV-TR, 78 % met DSM-5 ASD criteria. Sensitivity of DSM-5 was significantly increased by reducing the number of criteria required for a DSM-5 diagnosis, or by rating 'uncertain' criteria as 'present', without sacrificing specificity. Reduced rates of ASD diagnosis may mean some ASD individuals will be unable to access clinical services.

Indexed as

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental DisordersAdolescentAdultAgedAsperger SyndromeAutistic DisorderChild Development Disorders, PervasiveFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSensitivity and SpecificityYoung Adult

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.