SynthesisClinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2013
Reproductive outcomes, including neonatal data, following sperm injection in men with obstructive and nonobstructive azoospermia: case series and systematic review.
Synthesis in Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05110391 (Sperm Retrieval Rates by Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction in Non-obstructive Azoospermic Men Subjected to Gonadotropin Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Sperm Retrieval Rates by Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction in Non-obstructive Azoospermic Men Subjected to Gonadotropin Therapy
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 88 citations in OpenAlex.
- The risk of TESE-induced hypogonadism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Human reproduction update · 2018Pooled it
- Outcome of varicocele repair in men with nonobstructive azoospermia: systematic review and meta-analysis.Asian journal of andrologyPooled it
- Semen Quality and DNA Fragmentation After Limited Testicular Sperm Extraction in Non-Azoospermic Men With ART Failure: A Retrospective Matched Cohort Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Swadamshtradi rasayana attenuates radiofrequency radiation-induced oxidative stress and improves sperm parameters in Swiss albino mice.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026Article
- ICSI with surgically retrieved sperm in azoospermia: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of reproductive, perinatal, long-term, and paternal outcomes.Systematic reviews · 2025Article
- Pregnancy outcomes in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia undergoing micro-TESE: comparison of fresh vs. frozen-thawed testicular sperm.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024Article
- Non-Obstructive Azoospermia and Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection: Unveiling the Chances of Success and Possible Consequences for Offspring.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Prevalence and clinical implications of biochemical hypogonadism in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia undergoing infertility evaluation.F&S reports · 2024Article
- 2023 Canadian Urological Association guideline: Evaluation and management of azoospermia.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2023Article
- Double strand DNA breaks in sperm: the bad guy in the crowd.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2023Article
- In Vitro Fertilisation and Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection predictive factors: A review of the effect of female age, ovarian reserve, male age, and male factor on IVF/ICSI treatment outcomes.JBRA assisted reproduction · 2023Review
- High sperm DNA fragmentation: do we have robust evidence to support antioxidants and testicular sperm extraction to improve fertility outcomes? a narrative review.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Review
- Novel predictors for livebirth delivery rate in patients with idiopathic non-obstructive azoospermia based on the clinical prediction model.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Article
- Switching to testicular sperm after a previous ICSI failure with ejaculated sperm significantly improves blastocyst quality without increasing aneuploidy risk.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2022Article
- Microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) in men with infertility due to nonobstructive azoospermia: summary of current literature.International urology and nephrology · 2021Review
- Comparison of intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes in azoospermic men who underwent testicular sperm extraction vs. microdissection testicular sperm extraction: A cross-sectional study.International journal of reproductive biomedicine · 2021Article
- Differential Diagnosis of Azoospermia in Men with Infertility.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- [Testicular sperm extraction in male infertility : Indications, success rates, practical implementation, and possible complications].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2021Review
- Sperm DNA fragmentation testing: Summary evidence and clinical practice recommendations.Andrologia · 2021Review
- Fresh vs frozen testicular sperm for assisted reproductive technology in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia: A systematic review.Arab journal of urology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We compared pregnancy outcomes following intracytoplasmic sperm injection for the treatment of male infertility according to the type of azoospermia. First, we analyzed our data from 370 couples who underwent intracytoplasmic sperm injection using sperm from men with obstructive azoospermia and nonobstructive azoospermia, and the outcomes were compared to a group of 465 non-azoospermic infertile males. Then, we performed a systematic review of the published data on pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of children born after sperm injection using sperm from men with obstructive and nonobstructive azoospermia. Live birth rates were significantly lower in the nonobstructive azoospermia group (21.4%) compared with the obstructive azoospermia (37.5%) and ejaculated sperm (32.3%) groups. A total of 326 live births resulted in 427 babies born. Differences were not observed between the groups in gestational age, preterm birth, birth weight and low birth weight, although we noted a tendency towards poorer neonatal outcomes in the azoospermia categories. The overall perinatal death and malformation rates were 2.8% and 1.6%, respectively, and the results did not differ between the groups. We identified 20 published studies that directly compared pregnancy outcomes between obstructive azoospermia and nonobstructive azoospermia. Most of these studies were not designed to detect differences in live birth rates and had lower power to detect differences in less frequent outcomes, and the reporting of neonatal outcomes was unusual. The included studies reported either a decrease or no difference in pregnancy outcomes with intracytoplasmic sperm injection in cases of nonobstructive azoospermia and obstructive azoospermia. In general, no major differences were noted in short-term neonatal outcomes and congenital malformation rates between children from fathers with nonobstructive azoospermia and obstructive azoospermia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.